Slow Love™ said:And Symonds makes no mistake! Lara gone, and Bracken causing some real problems.
Barney Rubble said:This thread is far more up to date than Cricinfo, Lara's only faced 1 ball so far according to them.
EDIT: He only faced two in total, haha!![]()
James said:Goodness me, what is the point of having the third umpire if the on field umpires aren't going to use them?
Poor decision.
Give the guy some credit. He bowled a consistent line, kept it tight, and he had Sangakkara playing awkwardly in the air in that region twice - as well as the one that went straight up that Katich should have taken.Blaze said:Lol turn it up. Lara played a very lazy shot.
Slow Love™ said:Give the guy some credit. He bowled a consistent line, kept it tight, and he had Sangakkara playing awkwardly in the air in that region twice - as well as the one that went straight up that Katich should have taken.
Yeah, 18 matches, 29 wickets at 19.65 with an econ at 3.9. I'm not sure why he hasn't been in the team for so long (his last match was in November of 2003 [8 overs, 1/15 in India])Blaze said:Looking at Brackens stats, he has a very good ODI record.
You're right, they should have. And I'm sure part of the point of the trial would be to give the concept a fair workout. Having said that, I felt quite confident at the time he was struck, and after watching the replays, I still think it was out.James said:Goodness me, what is the point of having the third umpire if the on field umpires aren't going to use them?
Poor decision.