alternative
Cricket Web Content Updater
yeh bell played a very good knock, and now collingwood.. as marc said, there are plenty of starts.. which is a promising sign..
I don't know, I've never seen him bowl - neither have you, and neither has Kambli, which is my point. He took 54 (I think) wickets @ 21 in English conditions last year, so he's done a lot better in FC cricket than 90% of spinners to play in England in recent years. We'll see how good he really is if and when he makes his Test debut - until then, people like Kambli and yourself should stop passing judgement, else you're going to look very stupid if he does succeed.sheerindianspeed said:You actually think Pan is actually any good???
though it has to be said that Wantage Road hardly constitutes English conditions at present - it's a complete bunsenBarney Rubble said:I don't know, I've never seen him bowl - neither have you, and neither has Kambli, which is my point. He took 54 (I think) wickets @ 21 in English conditions last year, so he's done a lot better in FC cricket than 90% of spinners to play in England in recent years. We'll see how good he really is if and when he makes his Test debut - until then, people like Kambli and yourself should stop passing judgement, else you're going to look very stupid if he does succeed.
True, but he didn't take all of them at Wantage Road I guess.superkingdave said:though it has to be said that Wantage Road hardly constitutes English conditions at present - it's a complete bunsen
Depends what you mean by 'key batter'. I think everyone knows what to expect from him in the series, grinding slow-scoring cricket and 40 or so average for the series unless the pitches are particularly different from expected. It's how the others bat that will probably decide how the series plays out, because KP/Flintoff especially could be brilliant, or they could be awful, if the most of the rest of the batsmen are awful Bell won't have time to score many anyway.UncleTheOne said:It looks more and more obvious that Bell is going to be England's key batter in this series. He's taken Thorpe's place and is going to be so crucial holding the England innings together.
Back on page 32. He was just banging on about how he feels England will get spanked and that he fears for Monty if given his chance against the mighty Indian batsmen.Jono said:What did Kambli say?
no, he played 4 games away from home - taking 7-185 in the game at Essex (Chelmsford is pretty spin friendly aswell), 4-48 against Worcestershire, 0-80 against Leicestershire and 4-124 against Somerset. He didn't play in a couple of away games because Northants only played one spinner and chose Brown.Barney Rubble said:True, but he didn't take all of them at Wantage Road I guess.
I feel he'll be key in the way that you can build an innings around him. He can grind out scores whilst the bashers like KP and Freddie (providing he took his batting brain with him) can play around him. He can be the glue that holds the innings together.Scaly piscine said:Depends what you mean by 'key batter'. I think everyone knows what to expect from him in the series, grinding slow-scoring cricket and 40 or so average for the series unless the pitches are particularly different from expected. It's how the others bat that will probably decide how the series plays out, because KP/Flintoff especially could be brilliant, or they could be awful, if the most of the rest of the batsmen are awful Bell won't have time to score many anyway.
UncleTheOne said:Back on page 32. He was just banging on about how he feels England will get spanked and that he fears for Monty if given his chance against the mighty Indian batsmen.
Lol, I should think not. I don't think Mr. 9 bat grips has played for sometime.Scaly piscine said:Hmm, seems like he's a bit of a troll really. I don't suppose Kambli is going to be playing in any of the warm-up games by any chance?
Indeed Tres will be crucial. Especially if it's not doing much early on for the Indian quicks, they could quickly turn into cannon fodder, he certainly is key in setting the tone to an innings for England. Along with Bell he seems the most at home play in the sub-continent.Jono said:The batsman, from an Indian viewpoint, I fear the most is Trescothick. I'm worried that he may take India's opening bowlers apart, particularly if conditions don't suit Pathan, and will be well set to combat the spinners. I can always see Freddy or Pietersen throwing their wicket away, and whilst Bell may graft out runs he won't turn the game in a session I'd imagine, but Trescothick is someone I think will play very well on this tour. England's starts will be vital, if they build platforms for the middle order, and if the middle order don't stuff it up like they did in Pakistan, then England will be in a good position.
Read my series preview - I picked out Trescothick as England's key man. Great minds think alike, eh?Jono said:The batsman, from an Indian viewpoint, I fear the most is Trescothick. I'm worried that he may take India's opening bowlers apart, particularly if conditions don't suit Pathan, and will be well set to combat the spinners. I can always see Freddy or Pietersen throwing their wicket away, and whilst Bell may graft out runs he won't turn the game in a session I'd imagine, but Trescothick is someone I think will play very well on this tour. England's starts will be vital, if they build platforms for the middle order, and if the middle order don't stuff it up like they did in Pakistan, then England will be in a good position.
Key to England's success will be Marcus Trescothick, Hussain believes. "When Trescothick is at the crease in the subcontinent England look much more in control. He allows less experienced players to bed in, sweeps a lot and has the right balance between attack and defence. But he more than anyone needs to keep his energy levels going throughout the tour. It was noticeable in Pakistan that Trescothick faded a bit towards the end, as he has on other tours."
My cricketing insight is surprising even to myself.Jono said:Hehe yeah Nasser too agrees.