• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** England in India

tooextracool

International Coach
Jono said:
You honestly think RP Singh has no potential as a bowler and will be a Nehra or Zaheer? I'm not saying he's world class or anything, but he hasn't shown you the slightest thing that suggests he may become a good test bowler?

If that's the case, what do you think of him as a ODI bowler?
its difficult to say whether hes a good enough ODI bowler or not based on just a handful of ODIs, most of which i havent watched. but from what ive seen from him in tests thus far, hes looked largely incapable, both in terms of variety as well as pace. of course that doesnt mean that he can never succeed but as of right now, he isnt test class.
 

alternative

Cricket Web Content Updater
I am looking forward to see monty panesar bowl.. should be an exciting battle..
But i think for england to win, they need their fast bowlers to strike..
 

adharcric

International Coach
tooextracool said:
i cant see how pathan is test class with the ball. hes been exposed to be woefully below par almost everytime hes stepped onto the field except when the conditions were completely in his favor and his record is almost disgraceful when you remove his games against bangladesh and zimbabwe. he doesnt have too much variety in his bowling either, and im afraid when you bowl at a bit over 75 mph you're never going to threaten anyone unless the ball is swinging vigorously.
RP singh i fear wont be too much different from the zaheer khans and ashish nehras that have run wild in indian cricket. i havent had a chance to see munaf patel or vrv singh bowl, but from what ive seen off shree santh so far, other than the fact that his radar is shocking, hes shown at least some potential to be test standard.
Well I would say his swing is pretty lethal when he's on song. That test hat-trick against Pakistan was one example. You don't need great pace if you have good variation or swing (McGrath, Pollock today) and I think Pathan can be that kind of a bowler because he can control the ball pretty well. Now don't think that I'm even starting to make any comparisons between Pathan and those two or any other world-class bowlers. He definitely needs to increase his pace to AT LEAST the low 80s on a consistent basis to become world-class, but he can be test-class the way he's bowling right now provided that he keeps the swing and control that's made him effectively lately. He's bowled well against Sri Lanka but fared poorly in the 2nd innings at Karachi. He wasn't very ineffective on those dead tracks because of his lack of pace either. On the whole, Pathan is definitely test-class but needs additional pace and consistency to approach world-class status.
 

tooextracool

International Coach
adharcric said:
Well I would say his swing is pretty lethal when he's on song. That test hat-trick against Pakistan was one example. You don't need great pace if you have good variation or swing (McGrath, Pollock today) and I think Pathan can be that kind of a bowler because he can control the ball pretty well. Now don't think that I'm even starting to make any comparisons between Pathan and those two or any other world-class bowlers. He definitely needs to increase his pace to AT LEAST the low 80s on a consistent basis to become world-class, but he can be test-class the way he's bowling right now provided that he keeps the swing and control that's made him effectively lately. He's bowled well against Sri Lanka but fared poorly in the 2nd innings at Karachi. He wasn't very ineffective on those dead tracks because of his lack of pace either. On the whole, Pathan is definitely test-class but needs additional pace and consistency to approach world-class status.
pathan doesnt really swing the ball unless the conditions really assist him. nor can he swing the ball both ways. his hatrick against pakistan was in really swing friendly conditions and you only need to look at the ball that got youhana out(seriously that swung from outside off stump to middle stump) to realise that hes only effective in extremely favorable conditions. you dont need pace if you have good variation yes, but pathan has no real variety in his armoury.
 

adharcric

International Coach
tooextracool said:
pathan doesnt really swing the ball unless the conditions really assist him. nor can he swing the ball both ways. his hatrick against pakistan was in really swing friendly conditions and you only need to look at the ball that got youhana out(seriously that swung from outside off stump to middle stump) to realise that hes only effective in extremely favorable conditions. you dont need pace if you have good variation yes, but pathan has no real variety in his armoury.
alright well you do have a point, but we're better off seeing pathan's next few series in various conditions and then assessing him than going back and forth and citing various instances. i'll admit he hasn't met expectations with his bowling display in pakistan, but he looked good against sri lanka at home, and those weren't swing-friendly conditions. let's see how he does against england, west indies and south africa.
 

adharcric

International Coach
It's been a while since I was this pleased with the selectors in India. First, they include the three proven genuine quicks in the BP XI squad (Sreesanth, Munaf Patel, VR Singh). Now, Abid Nabi ends up in the MCA XI squad somehow (he's from J&K ... and where did Uthappa come from) and reportedly bowls a "probing spell" with "considerable lift at a sharp pace", with 5 maidens and 1 over with lucky runs. He's one tearaway prospect who hasn't done so well on the domestic circuit, but I'm glad he got this chance against England. Add his name to the list ... VRV, Munaf, Sreesanth, Ahmed, Yomahesh
 

Arumpnoo

School Boy/Girl Cricketer
adharcric said:
alright well you do have a point, but we're better off seeing pathan's next few series in various conditions and then assessing him than going back and forth and citing various instances. i'll admit he hasn't met expectations with his bowling display in pakistan, but he looked good against sri lanka at home, and those weren't swing-friendly conditions. let's see how he does against england, west indies and south africa.
I don't think Pathan will make much of an impact during the series. I am guessing that the wickets will be dusty with moving top surface tailor made for Kumble and Bhajji. But if Pathan gets assistance from the wicket, Jones will come to crash the Indian party. All in all, should be a good contest.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
ajaagarkarajaaja said:
I don't think England batsmen are capable of facing the deadly trio of Harb-Kumble on spin oriented Indian pitches, you don't learn over night how to cope with such class bowlers.
Trio?!
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
wpdavid said:
Definitely an improvement. Hope he doesn't go the same way as the England cricketer who caught sunstroke after going shaven headed in the WI though.
Chris Lewis was an idiot though.
 

adharcric

International Coach
marc71178 said:
42 wickets at 46.26 when the gimmies are taken away...
I'm very well aware of that, I'm talking about how he's looked lately. Obviously he hasn't been consistent enough, hence the pathetic record.
 

superkingdave

Hall of Fame Member
anyway England are 257-5 in the tour opener. Strauss and Vaughan got 50's, Flintoff and Pietersen starts but then out. Bell is 72* and Collingwood 21* (Prior got a duck)
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
A lot of starts, but not many really going on.

Good to see Bell retaining a bit of form, just needs to get the rest of the side to learn to temper their aggression...
 

social

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Anyone else think it's strange that the President's X1 resorted to using 9 bowlers on day 1?

They ended up with a reasonable result, but it doesnt say much for the front-liners in their team.
 

The Baconator

International Vice-Captain
social said:
Anyone else think it's strange that the President's X1 resorted to using 9 bowlers on day 1?

They ended up with a reasonable result, but it doesnt say much for the front-liners in their team.
It's 16-a-side, so most most of them are frontliners.
 

Top