FaaipDeOiad
Hall of Fame Member
Heh. What garbage.
I think motime has made fair points. Those stupid comments were from another article, I think. His own comments made sense, IMHO.C_C said:Umm...ok....
Earth to motime..come in motime.....come in.
Please stop orgasming over fantasies and return to earth.
<End of transmission>
So, remind me how England have gone against other teams in ODIs recently? Like, say, South Africa, and New Zealand? And then tell me how Australia went against those teams, last time they played them?godofcricket said:The No one ranking team (ODI) from here has to be england......
Given that England have won one live Ashes test in 16 years, and that Australia haven't been beaten in a series outside of the subcontinent in 12 years, I don't think Australia has to "fight hard" to maintain anything. England have to start beating Australia first, before there can be any serious consideration of how close the teams might be.godofcricket said:The No1 from tests point of view will be tough between England and Australia, both have to fight hard to maintian it
I think february this year and the matches against NZ (last year) seem quite a long time now......england are mentally more tough now then say 5 or 6 months back where we couldnt even think to match them to Australia......and that was the time when Australia didnt seem to loose any match. Believe me things have changed!!!! England have got much more bowling options and a completely stable batting line-up where everyone seems to know their role at any given moment.FaaipDeOiad said:So, remind me how England have gone against other teams in ODIs recently? Like, say, South Africa, and New Zealand? And then tell me how Australia went against those teams, last time they played them?
I am not relating anything to such a long history, as i said u cant compare the team england has now to the one year back.......this is a different english team. I know exactly what u mean in ur post, it might take england some time to get to No1 rankings in tests, but its how they will make Australia fight during this period is what counts.FaaipDeOiad said:Given that England have won one live Ashes test in 16 years, and that Australia haven't been beaten in a series outside of the subcontinent in 12 years, I don't think Australia has to "fight hard" to maintain anything. England have to start beating Australia first, before there can be any serious consideration of how close the teams might be.
Remind me when the last Australia-South Africa ODI was?FaaipDeOiad said:So, remind me how England have gone against other teams in ODIs recently? Like, say, South Africa, and New Zealand? And then tell me how Australia went against those teams, last time they played them?
No, we've just got Kevin Pietersen who played his most miraculous innings yet, and simply cannot keep on doing it forever.godofcricket said:I think february this year and the matches against NZ (last year) seem quite a long time now......england are mentally more tough now then say 5 or 6 months back where we couldnt even think to match them to Australia......and that was the time when Australia didnt seem to loose any match. Believe me things have changed!!!! England have got much more bowling options and a completely stable batting line-up where everyone seems to know their role at any given moment.
2002. 5-1 Australia.Richard said:Remind me when the last Australia-South Africa ODI was?