For the Sean (if he hasn't died of the suspense), and anyone else:
Criteria for rating allrounders.
1. First of all, multipy their batting and bowling ratings.
Example: Sobers has a batting rating of 845 and a bowling rating of 352. Added together, that gives him 1197 points.
The leaders after doing this are:
1. Hadlee 1244
2. Imran 1243
3. Sobers 1197
4. Kallis 1152
5. Botham 1140
6. Miller 1065
7. Pollock 1062
8. Faulkner 1052
9. Kapil 1006
2. Runs per wicket. IMO, an ideal allrounder would take 20 runs per wicket (anyone who sees differently is welcome to post a response). Divide the runs per wicket of each player by 20 to ascertain how many percentage points they are away from the 'ideal' 20 mark. Or, if they are a bowling allrounder, divide 20 by the runs per wicket.
For example: Sobers (batting allrounder). 34.18 RPW. Divide this by 20 and you get 1.71 (i.e. 71% away from the ideal mark of 20). I then muliply 71 by 1.5 (why? Because it seems to get the best result). And, therefore, Sobers loses 106.5 off his original rating of 1197.
For Hadlee, a bowling allrounder, I divide 20 by his RPW of 7.25. He is 176% away from the ideal mark of 20. Therefore, he loses 264 points (171*1.5) from his original rating of 1244.
Now, the closest anyone has come to the ideal mark of 20 RPW is Goddard with 20.46, followed by Faulkner with 21.39.
The leaders after this stage are:
Imran Khan (P) 1108
G.S. Sobers (WI) 1091
I.T. Botham (E) 1070
K.R. Miller (A) 1043
G.A. Faulkner (SA) 1042
J.H. Kallis (SA) 1005
R.J. Hadlee (NZ) 980
N. Kapil Dev (I) 909
C.L. Cairns (NZ) 885
S.M. Pollock (SA) 882
T.L. Goddard (SA) 845
3. Difference between batting average and bowling average.
Imran has a batting average of 37.69 and a bowling average of 22.81. Therefore, the difference is +14.88. This is multiplied by 10 and therefore Imran gets 148.8 points added to his existing 1108.
The big winners are the batting allrounders here, such as Sobers and Kallis. I am thinking that maybe this part of the equation needs some adjustment. Comments are welcome. The losers are those who have a lesser batting average then bowling average (none of the top 20), such as Vettori and Vass.
Anyway, we end up with:
G.S. Sobers (WI) 1328
Imran Khan (P) 1257
J.H. Kallis (SA) 1239
G.A. Faulkner (SA) 1184
K.R. Miller (A) 1183
I.T. Botham (E) 1121
R.J. Hadlee (NZ) 1029
S.M. Pollock (SA) 973
T.L. Goddard (SA) 927
C.L. Cairns (NZ) 926
4. 100 runs/5 wickets a match bonus.
What i mean is 100+ runs over two innings and a total of 5 wickets over the course of the match. Each time a player does this, he gets 15 bonus points.
Sobers and Botham have each done this 7 times. Next is, surprisingly, Greig (4). Imran only did it 2 times with a host of others, including Kallis
5. Another bonus. Anyone to complete the 2000 runs/100 wkts double gets an extra 30 points. Anyone (actually only Botham and Kapil at this stage) to complete 5000 runs/250 wkts gets an extra 70 points.
6. Divide the grand total by 1.5. Why? It just looks nice if the top allrounder is close to 1000 points. 1000 points for me in my ratings makes you a near 'immortal'.
So, after all that lads, I need a warm beer or two with W.G, who usually prefers a scotch.
A reminder of the final ratings:
G.S. Sobers (WI) 975
Imran Khan (P) 878
I.T. Botham (E) 867
J.H. Kallis (SA) 866
K.R. Miller (A) 828
G.A. Faulkner (SA) 809
R.J. Hadlee (NZ) 706
S.M. Pollock (SA) 679
N. Kapil Dev (I) 675
A.W. Greig (E) 672
C.L. Cairns (NZ) 657
T.L. Goddard (SA) 648
W. Rhodes (E) 568
M.A. Noble (A) 550
A. Flintoff (E) 541
A.K. Davidson (A) 534
J.M. Gregory (A) 531
C. Kelleway (A) 524
Wasim Akram (P) 521
M.H. Mankad (I) 520
Of course, if anyone disagrees with my methods, please reply, as long as its constructive criticism
because it will help to make these ratings better.