Shane Warne
Banned
Mr Mxyzptlk said:Who's that?
:rolleyes:
Mr Mxyzptlk said:Who's that?
Well ganguly averfaged over 50 on India's tour ofthe West Indies which was about two years ago as well as on the subsequent tour to England.marc71178 said:Which would be funny if it wasn't the fact that this thread started off nearly 2 years ago, so Ganguly has hardly gone straight out and done it!!!
That doesn't quite answer my question.Shane Warne said::rolleyes:
Tell me what a hat-trick proves? Does it makes him a great bowler? Does it makes him better then say Hadlee who never took one. Razzaq to me was just slogging and benefiting from some rubbish bowling from Adams. So a good fielder and a wondefrful runner doesnt make him great. Just look at Justin Ontong. What do you have to cry egg about?FRAZ said:Abdul Razzaq is a one day player that each and every country would like to have in their side .
man just look at his record +30 one day average . 1.33 wickets per match and he is a wonderful runner between the wicket. he is a good fielder and just check his batting performance against KIWIS. cry egg sorry craig , what are you talking about . He has one good hattrick in tests . 3 centuries in tests . He can bat at any number and infact he has .
When his Test career started and how many years ago was that? Tell me what he has done since?FRAZ said:Azhar mehmood has won so many games for PAKIS . He has made back to back centuries against South Africa in tests . He is a very good Bowler .
So because he got Tendulkar out doesnt make him a great bowler. So is Michael Vaughan a great bowler because he got Tendulkar out?FRAZ said:And also both of them would have got more wickets in tests and one dayers but imagine if you are playing along with Saqlain , Waqar , Wasim, Shoaib and occasionally Mushtaq Ahmed then how come you can get more wickets, Its the matter of distribution of wickets . Be sensible and admitt you said wrong , dont just stick with a wrong statement that you have made . Abdul Razzaq has bowled out Tendulkar 6 times in onedayers . And Azhar is also not way behind Razzaq.
Currantly Waqar is twice the bowler Sami is.FRAZ said:Sami is a young guy . And actually its been the history that when ever an express bowler fails , then people who are just the ordinary spectators just suddenly reject them , and why they do that because they expect them to do more . Same happened in case of Lee. Aussie selection committe is not ediotic , they again trusted him because they know whats right and wrong . Lee is not rubbish , Sami is not rubbish . Remember Sami almost won first test against KIWIS in the recent series . If I am selecting their team I will definately put Sami there , and actually he needs a little experience. What Pakistni board did to Waqar was absolutely right , Because has definately lost his prime and as far as Sami is concerned he has nt seen his prime yet . He ll learn.
Craig said:Tell me what a hat-trick proves? Does it makes him a great bowler? Does it makes him better then say Hadlee who never took one. Razzaq to me was just slogging and benefiting from some rubbish bowling from Adams. So a good fielder and a wondefrful runner doesnt make him great. Just look at Justin Ontong. What do you have to cry egg about?
Anyway a Test average of around 30 is hardly special.
When his Test career started and how many years ago was that? Tell me what he has done since?
So because he got Tendulkar out doesnt make him a great bowler. So is Michael Vaughan a great bowler because he got Tendulkar out?
Abdul Razzaq- The best since Bradman? some one started this thred but why should have got premission from you .
Yeah Sunil Gavaskar was a junk who once said Razzaq is most definately a great allrounder in the making .
Bowling Tendulkar out not once not twice but a little more than that .
lolol . What a knowledgeable person I am talking to .
That's as maybe, but since the criticism of him was for not making a decent Test score for ages and his highest score in that series was 75, I think that he's hardly gone out and proven the critics wrong there!jamesryfler said:Well ganguly averfaged over 50 on India's tour ofthe West Indies which was about two years ago as well as on the subsequent tour to England.
So Try again Marc :P , my English muppet.
FRAZ said:What are you a crackpot?Craig said:Abdul Razzaq- The best since Bradman? some one started this thred but why should have got premission from you .
It is your opinion that you think he is world class just like the same what Sunil said.
Then again it could be your opinion that Liverpool are a great side and Emile Heskey is a great striker.
Please I am sorry but what I said I was right . And rather than telling your mom's dad's last name isnt necessary here . Trailer park people have good knowledge . I admitt you won ......Craig said:What are you a crackpot?
It is your opinion that you think he is world class just like the same what Sunil said.
Then again it could be your opinion that Liverpool are a great side and Emile Heskey is a great striker.
Razzak is a wonderful OD player who would qualify for most ODI teams. He would have become the best all rounder in the game today had there wan't a visible decine in his bowling.Craig said:Tell me what a hat-trick proves? Does it makes him a great bowler? Does it makes him better then say Hadlee who never took one. Razzaq to me was just slogging and benefiting from some rubbish bowling from Adams. So a good fielder and a wondefrful runner doesnt make him great. Just look at Justin Ontong. What do you have to cry egg about?
.
Not much, but it isn't his fault, coz his place was taken over by Razzak!! Frankly pak selectors didn't treat Azhar fairly, Azhar mahmood is an UNDER rated player rather than an over rated one.When his Test career started and how many years ago was that? Tell me what he has done since?
Perhaps, but I was at that game and the way he managed to pick the gaps was supernatural! Every ball went over the heads or short of the boundary riders. It was amazing, and frustrating as hell for me!Craig said:Razzaq to me was just slogging and benefiting from some rubbish bowling from Adams.
Better? This word has the approval of the Broadcasting Standards Authority in NZ!Tim said:Sorry mate, but that avatar will need to be changed.
No worries mate - don't want to ruffle any feathers... at least not over this!Tim said:I'll let the higher authority decide on that one, but I don't think there'll be a problem.
Sorry but rules are rules, thanks for doing it straight away