• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Wasim Akram vs Dennis Lillee

Who was the greater bowler?

  • Wasim Akram

    Votes: 38 50.0%
  • Dennis Lillee

    Votes: 38 50.0%

  • Total voters
    76

Coronis

International Coach
It's not just the SC, he just didn't tour much overall. A grand total of 10 tests outside Australia and England just looks odd in an era that included several other non minnow teams.

Pretty unarguable that touring repeatedly to countries with a variety (not necessarily difficulty) of conditions/pitches is one of the biggest challenges in test cricket and he didn't really do it (or didn't get the chance to do?) much. Still have him as a top 10 pacer because of other reasons but it's fair to have this is a bit of a ding against his record imo.
Oh I’m not even specifically talking about Lillee. Just that it keeps getting brought up endlessly in every thread it seems, as the be all and end all.
 

Van_Sri

U19 Debutant
It's not just the SC, he just didn't tour much overall. A grand total of 10 tests outside Australia and England just looks odd in an era that included several other non minnow teams.

Pretty unarguable that touring repeatedly to countries with a variety (not necessarily difficulty) of conditions/pitches is one of the biggest challenges in test cricket and he didn't really do it (or didn't get the chance to do?) much. Still have him as a top 10 pacer because of other reasons but it's fair to have this is a bit of a ding against his record imo.
What’s surprising is even in ODI’s Lillee played only in Australia, England and New Zealand. So out of 458 International Wickets Lillee took 452 Wickets he took only in 🇦🇺 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 🇳🇿, A True Patriot of British Empire.
 
Last edited:

pardus

U19 12th Man
What’s surprising is even in ODI’s Lillee played only in Australia, England and New Zealand.
Not surprising. He retired practically at the end of 1983.
Worldwide boom of ODI cricket (meaning multi-team tournaments involving Australia, like the ones in Sharjah in 90s etc.) hadn't happened at the time. Major ODI cricket was still limited to bilaterals, World Cups (all England) and WSC (mostly Australia).
 

Qlder

International Regular
I see someone changed their vote to Lillee to now make it 36 to 34. Just need one more person to change their vote and we have a tie 😀
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
Just proves you voted correctly the first time before becoming brainwashed by this "should have played in Asia despite no tours he was selected for" nonsense
No. I was too influenced by surface stats and later realised there are valid reasons why Wasims record isn't better.
 

Migara

International Coach
Dennis Lillee was highly regarded not because he got a back problem in West Indies or he did not perform well in Sri Lanka or Philippines, He gave his best in series that matters most for Australia during his time period. He popularized fast bowling more than any other bowler for the cricket 🏏 and he may have had his flaws but that won’t matter much when you compare his performance to that of other bowlers of his era.
Whole lot of hog wash to cover up poor performances on slower wickets.
 

kyear2

International Coach
Marshall had a pretty solid peer rating in his era but wasn't as celebrated among pundits about it, it was more the chatter among players and now has come to light.
After the India series in '83 till 1990 or so there was no doubt who the best bowler in the world was, at least not by his peers.

The pundits were too busy being mortified by what the WI pacers were doing to destroy the game, and trying to come up with ways to change the rules. Despite it being exactly what they had previously lauded Lillee for.

With regards to Lillee, from a peer perspective post Lindwall, there's only been 4, and arguably 5 if Steyn is included who's been looked upon as greatest of their era and contender for the best. Lillee is still seen by many as among them. Lillee like Ambrose here for some, is criticized for not playing enough in the SC, but firstly, you can only play who you play, and most importantly, they were scheduled most to play who were their biggest rivals and competition. Don't think India nor Australia are lining up to send tours to the Caribbean these days either. So yes, while it can be noted that his record wasn't as complete, it's not a bludgeon to be used to disqualify him either.

While Wasim is also there, it's argued my some that it's more to do with skill than results and there's definitely some conflation with regards to his odi exploits. Also with regards to his reign at the top, it was also possibly the shortest, not even being seen as the best untill Ambrose's shoulder surgery in '94. But the genius shines through and so it's been

Lillee
Marshall
Wasim
McGrath
Steyn

Looking past the genius and looking at the numbers though, it's not beyond the pale to rate Wasim last among that group. Especially when looking at length of reign and impact.
 

Van_Sri

U19 Debutant
Dennis Lillee Record in Australia, England and New Zealand - 349 Wickets @22.78 vs Glenn McGrath Record in Australia, England and New Zealand - 406 Wickets @21.47 vs Richard Hadlee - 348 Wickets @22.22 in Australia, England and New Zealand vs Shane Warne - 497 Wickets @24.74 in Australia, England and New Zealand.
 
Last edited:

Johan

International Vice-Captain
Hmmm.... I would say both played some alrightish English teams. No top tier Greats (except an old Boycott for Lillee), but a number of very good ones, even some ATVGs in Gower, Gooch, Smith, etc.
Robin Smith vs Cheteshwar Pujara should be a good thread.
 

Top