Johan
International Vice-Captain
that's a fair point, my point was refuting Lillee had a bad record in West Indies.Lillee still doesn't have a reasonable sample in the entire SC.
everyone knows he, like Trueman, didn't play in SC.
that's a fair point, my point was refuting Lillee had a bad record in West Indies.Lillee still doesn't have a reasonable sample in the entire SC.
Yeah except he averaged 30 plus with 23 wickets in 6 tests.Averaging 28 against Peak Windies in Windies and being called mixed is like averaging 42-43 in West Indies against 3 of the quaret and that being called Mixed.
Point is he was a flop on slow wickets. Even couldn't blast away minnow Sri Lanka team and average 35 against them.
Dennis Lillee was highly regarded not because he got a back problem in West Indies or he did not perform well in Sri Lanka or Philippines, He gave his best in series that matters most for Australia during his time period. He popularized fast bowling more than any other bowler for the cricket and he may have had his flaws but that won’t matter much when you compare his performance to that of other bowlers of his era.79 was a home series mate.
Lillee sucked on slower wickets. Deal with it.
I said the Peak/Mighty Windies, 73 Windies ain't that sideYeah except he averaged 30 plus with 23 wickets in 6 tests.
You cant include only the best returns for Lillee and not Wasim.
No free rides.This playing in the SC **** is starting to get so old
That was a good WI batting side and he got spanked compared to the rest of the attack.I said the Peak/Mighty Windies, 73 Windies ain't that side
So you are basically saying he did bad against even the weaker side he faced while not necessarily excelling against the stronger one??I said the Peak/Mighty Windies, 73 Windies ain't that side
Irrelevant to my initial statement.That was a good WI batting side and he got spanked compared to the rest of the attack.
also irrelevant to my initial statement.So you are basically saying he did bad against even the weaker side he faced while not necessarily excelling against the stronger one??
You do know that he bowled through the pain of what would become a broken back in that test? The injury was so bad many say it's a miracle that he ever played againThat was a good WI batting side and he got spanked compared to the rest of the attack.
as expected, context.You do know that test he bowled through the pain of what would become a broken back I'm that test. The injury was so bad many say it's a miracle that he ever played again
No the point is we treat WI as an overall record which you are comparing with England.Irrelevant to my initial statement.
also irrelevant to my initial statement.
Sure and Wasim played as a teen in England in 87.You do know that he bowled through the pain of what would become a broken back in that test? The injury was so bad many say it's a miracle that he ever played again
At least 30-50 extra wickets I reckon lost by Wasim.Actually Poor Slip Fielders of Pakistan did lot of harm to Wasim Akram
It's not just the SC, he just didn't tour much overall. A grand total of 10 tests outside Australia and England just looks odd in an era that included several other non minnow teams.This playing in the SC **** is starting to get so old
Akram was 21 when he played vs England in '87Sure and Wasim played as a teen in England in 87.
We include those stats but give context.
You're right sorry for the mixup.Akram was 21 when he played vs England in '87