honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
SS posts BS. Its not hard to understand, is it?
Lara himself stated his issues, so I was quoting him.Yeah what I find asinine is people using spinners like Raju and Saqlain to come to conclusions. Lara played both what a handful of times. Proves nothing. Lara faced Warne and Murali much more extensively and more than handled them. Anyone remembers Hirwani who famously took 16 wkts on debut vs the WI. Lara faced him in the Caribbean in a first class match and completely demorilised the kid. He did the same to guys like Kaneira etc. And fwiw, Kumble from India wasnt big issue for him vs india, it was surprisingly their seamers.
If am not wrong same saqlain was smashed by sehwag at multanLara himself stated his issues, so I was quoting him.
And what's wrong with a spinner like Saqlain? The guy gave even Tendulkar problems at a time when Tendulkar was smashing Warne.
That Saqlain was injured and a shadow of himself.If am not wrong same saqlain was smashed by sehwag at multan
Lara played Saqlain in exactly one series at a time when literally every bowler was giving Lara issues (1997). And fwiw, I already did say Sehwag is the best player of spin I've seen. My issue is, uniquely whenever BCL is brought up in a complimentary fashion, you have the same set of people trickling in with their little caveats. Lara made 153* "oh but Lara was dropped on 147 so it's not that great." Lara is great vs spin but he struggled vs the great Raju." And so on...Lara himself stated his issues, so I was quoting him.
And what's wrong with a spinner like Saqlain? The guy gave even Tendulkar problems at a time when Tendulkar was smashing Warne.
It is very clear how Lara was made to look foolish in 1993 India tour by Raju, that Shewag and Sidhu were pretty much ahead of any one playing spin. I would even put Mahela J above Lara when it comes to playing spin. He was not flamboyant as Lara but boy, he scored heavily against spin.It is very clear to anyone who watched and understands cricket that this is just bs.
Lara was done in the air time and time again by Saqlain. There was a dismissal too where a doosra goes through Lara's gate to get him bowled.Lmao he was just being humble."Problems" probably meant he couldn't smash them as hard as usual.
It's not like Shewag and Sidhu has not handed Warne and Murali, there arses.Yeah what I find asinine is people using spinners like Raju and Saqlain to come to conclusions. Lara played both what a handful of times. Proves nothing. Lara faced Warne and Murali much more extensively and more than handled them. Anyone remembers Hirwani who famously took 16 wkts on debut vs the WI. Lara faced him in the Caribbean in a first class match and completely demorilised the kid. He did the same to guys like Kaneira etc. And fwiw, Kumble from India wasnt big issue for him vs india, it was surprisingly their seamers.
Oh yes, that counts for nothing when other two have not struggled against a single spinner.Lara played Saqlain in exactly one series at a time when literally every bowler was giving Lara issues (1997). And fwiw, I already did say Sehwag is the best player of spin I've seen. My issue is, uniquely whenever BCL is brought up in a complimentary fashion, you have the same set of people trickling in with their little caveats. Lara made 153* "oh but Lara was dropped on 147 so it's not that great." Lara is great vs spin but he struggled vs the great Raju." And so on...
Sure, I would think for seasoned posters, these minor issues are legitimate points when talking about things like 'best player of spin ever' or 'best innings ever'. Nobody is is suggesting Lara wasn't great against spin overall or 153 wasn't a top tier knock.Lara played Saqlain in exactly one series at a time when literally every bowler was giving Lara issues (1997). And fwiw, I already did say Sehwag is the best player of spin I've seen. My issue is, uniquely whenever BCL is brought up in a complimentary fashion, you have the same set of people trickling in with their little caveats. Lara made 153* "oh but Lara was dropped on 147 so it's not that great." Lara is great vs spin but he struggled vs the great Raju." And so on...
Here is Lara mentioning it himself.Lara was done in the air time and time again by Saqlain. There was a dismissal too where a doosra goes through Lara's gate to get him bowled.
Denial of the truth as well.Repeating lies dont take you anywhere.
What's the lie? Watch the clip yourself.Its kinda funny that two biased idiots have to beg an entire forum to accept a lie.
Is it pathetically laughable or laughably pathetic?
There's your next poll @PlayerComparisons
I already rated Sehwag as the best. Sidhu, I'm on the fence because by your own admittance, the Murali he faced early on, isn't the same Murali who was near unplayable (especially at home) post 2000. But whatever.It's not like Shewag and Sidhu has not handed Warne and Murali, there arses.
Lol dude every single post of yours reeks of saltiness. I'm sure I'm not the only one who notices.Its obvious to anyone who has actually watched cricket that Sidhu was, at best, equal 3rd when it comes to playing spin in the 90s side - Sachin, Azhar and I would put Kambli at the same level as Sidhu when it comes to smacking spin.
The statsguru salty needs to take a hike. The CC forum is always better when they post lesser and actual discussions take place than the biased crap they drool out.