wpdavid
Hall of Fame Member
I know there's a big element of subjectivity here, but I think you and I are talking about two slightly different things. Adelaide hurt in a way that yesterday never could; one of those days when you wake up, hear the score, and want to go back to bed for the rest of the week. And that involves the whole psychological impact of 1989-2003 coming back again when England were supposed to be competitive in these contests. It's like Nick Hornby wrote in 'Hi Fidelity' about needing to get me years ago to really screw me up, so yesterday's abomination doesn't carry the same emotional impact for people of my generation. However, was Adelaide Day 5 actually a worse performance than yesterday? I would suggest not because it was Warne on a fifth day pitch, and those are indeed circumstances when **** can very easily happen.Not an England fan but I think this is second after Adelaide. Looking back on it you see a weak England lineup on a 5th day Adelaide pitch against Warne and McGrath and it's kinda like, OK, **** happens. But that's not how it was at the time. It was the most hyped Ashes series of my lifetime by miles. Most English fans and pundits really felt like they were going to give it a good go.
The mood coming into this series wasn't like that at all, I've never seen them so pessimistic. The bookies had England as comfortable favourites, but most of the English pundits were predicting an India series win, which is a very rare combination. It's harder for a loss to be properly deflating in those circumstances.
Also tbf it's not the Ashes.