I do not appreciate this.Dave Waner 124*, NZ win by 15. Make it happen.
I share this.I do not appreciate having gone to bed at around about the point that Bracewell got tossed the ball.
Error.
Spot on.Ah now that was a fun game. I remember Australia were 100-1 odds on to win at one point last night. Which was highly generous given their ability to collapse and the fact that the only guy you'd look at from an opponent's perspective and think yea he's a big wicket is Clarke. The guys in the Aussie dressing room must think the same way, particularly Haddin given the way he bats.
I think the way Bracewell dominated in the late stages illustrates how experience is over-rated. Australia had some very experienced batsmen, unfortunately they have great experience of collapsing too. I find it funny that people go on about Southee needing more experience... err no he just needs to bowl better. Simple as that. If he goes and has a stint in County Cricket and improves his game it won't the experience of beating Derbyshire that'll make him have a light-bulb moment in a Test match. Experience is more of a team dynamic thing, for captaincy and when you're facing unusual conditions so there's not a negative novelty effect because you've played in them before. When you have experience of things that are almost entirely mental in nature (batting collapses, choking etc.) it tends to be bad experience leads to more bad and good experiences lead to more good.
Anyway will watch with interest what happens to the personnel of both teams. Who will be dropped or moved around.
It was by far his best series against and in Australia he's ever had. Possibly the last time he'll play them in Tests...a fitting end to that part of his career after years of struggle and frankly some ordinary boring.BLACK MAGIC
THE world rankings may tell us differently, but Australia's greatest threat this summer may have passed.
With veteran seamer Zaheer Khan still under an injury cloud, it would surprise if anything India's threadbare attack throws up anything that will test Australia as much as the pinpoint swing of 37-year-old Kiwi marvel Chris Martin.
The sideshow that is Martin's batting has taken the gloss off his excellence as as swing bowler.
His relentless interrogations of the likes of Ricky Ponting and Phil Hughes was a master class in that art.
God bless you Robert Craddock.
... at least he was big enough to give a little non-backhanded credit to NZ after this match though.Here's a tip. You won't read a word of dissension about it this week. Can you imagine having to watch this Kiwi team for three tests?
You make a pretty good case. Should start a thread about that.Ah now that was a fun game. I remember Australia were 100-1 odds on to win at one point last night. Which was highly generous given their ability to collapse and the fact that the only guy you'd look at from an opponent's perspective and think yea he's a big wicket is Clarke. The guys in the Aussie dressing room must think the same way, particularly Haddin given the way he bats.
I think the way Bracewell dominated in the late stages illustrates how experience is over-rated. Australia had some very experienced batsmen, unfortunately they have great experience of collapsing too. I find it funny that people go on about Southee needing more experience... err no he just needs to bowl better. Simple as that. If he goes and has a stint in County Cricket and improves his game it won't the experience of beating Derbyshire that'll make him have a light-bulb moment in a Test match. Experience is more of a team dynamic thing, for captaincy and when you're facing unusual conditions so there's not a negative novelty effect because you've played in them before. When you have experience of things that are almost entirely mental in nature (batting collapses, choking etc.) it tends to be bad experience leads to more bad and good experiences lead to more good.
Anyway will watch with interest what happens to the personnel of both teams. Who will be dropped or moved around.
I honestly don't think Watson is that bad against spin from a technical aspect, I think (like most of his problems) it's more mental. He just likes dominating too much and uses his 'get out' shot far too often against them.
QFT.The quality of chocolate used in Kinder Surprises has markedly reduced over the years.
Who should NZ drop when Vettori returns?
Bracewell.
Kudos to Phlegm tho:Even in this series Southee has looked more threatening than Bracewell throughout. Bracewell bowled one dangerous looking spell and looks village at other times. Southee hasn't blown the world away like we all hoped he would but I definitely think he should be retained on what he offers ahead of Bracewell.
& Athers completes his volte face a couple of wickets later:Doug Bracewell is always going to be underrated because he's a short, stocky bowler who bowls outswing at 138kph, rarely gets injured, and can bat.
He is Tim Bresnan.
Doug! Never drop this man! WAFG!!!!!
Been commented on before in the thread, but pretty fecking uncanny.Dave Waner 124*, NZ win by 15. Make it happen.
Ha, quite. Two superb contests involving Oz now cut off in their prime. Sucks puppy dogs willies, tbh.When's the 3rd test?
Are we sure about this? Don't think he's technically very flash at all. With his grip he's always going to be strangling the bat and playing stuff towards the on side. Not a fatal flaw, but I far prefer Warner's chops.Khawaja has looked the part technically and temperamentally (besides that awful shot today). But he hasn't made the score which would've secured his place. I expect him to get another opportunity against India, I think the selectors see him and Warner as the future of our top order.
It's a fallacy (if anyone thinks it) that Jesse was ever off the sauce..
Looks like Jess is back on the sauce. Hopefully that will improve his batting.
Not really. Our press are poor. Many seem to be focused on how the Australian press don't seem to be giving the NZers any credit for the win.any good articles about the win over in kiwi land