Pietersen to reply.Panicky gotta-get-off-the-mark singles
Back when I somewhat batted, this was always the killer for me. So many first ball run outs.Panicky gotta-get-off-the-mark singles
Speaking of cricket terminology that would be indecipherable to non-fans...Panicky gotta-get-off-the-mark singles
Panicky gotta-get-off-the-mark singles
It could also work in the context of a singles bar.Speaking of cricket terminology that would be indecipherable to non-fans...
Everyone here knows immediately what that means, but for the unenlightened it might as well be calculus in ancient Hebrew.
a proper pull shot involves full extension of the arms through the shot, a short arm jab usually has the arms bent and/or tucked into the body.What on earth is a "short arm jab" and how does it relate to a pull shot?
Yeah this gets my goat too. Though I'd rather hear that than DLF maximum tbh.Americanisms: I recall watching the cricket from Australia a number of years ago and seeing Botham hit an almighty six, boring Bob Willis described the hit as a 'home run'.
aka the T Mac, but he has the added bonus of not even watching the ball while he's jabbing. WAG!a short arm jab usually has the arms bent and/or tucked into the body.
Yes this, especially when it's said by that **** Nicklaus. I can't say he's the worst commentator ever, 'cause whenever he talks I only take in some of what he says nowadays.heard mark nicholas call a haddin 6 a maximum on the highlights from yesterday :ugh:
oh man, awta so hard.Umpires checking for a no-ball after a wicket falls. What this has led to is ****s like dharmasena not even looking at the front foot at all and only checking for it if a wicket falls. I'm dead sure virtually all no-balls on the other deliveries are missed or simply ignored by him.
Just automate the front-foot line ffs... It's getting to be a farce