The Jaunty one was a brilliant brilliant cricketer, as well as an ambassador for South Africa and if you are looking for a role model, you can look no further.. One of the nicest guys around..Anil said:my favourite batsman to watch has been david gower, favourite bowler malcolm marshall, favourite fielder jonty rhodes....
Was it Hutton?Voltman said:In regards to Hadlee being knighted, he was one of only two cricketers I believe who was knighted while still playing.
Can anyone help me out and let me know who the other one was?
That's what I thought, and Cricinfo seems to suggest that (in a roundabout way):marc71178 said:Was it Hutton?
http://uk.cricinfo.com/link_to_database/PLAYERS/ENG/H/HUTTON_L_01000694/The previous year MCC had made him an honorary member while he was still playing, and in June he received a knighthood for his great services to the game
reverse swing...or conventional in-swing????Richard said:IMO Marshall and Hadlee, indeed even Imran, were all more complete bowlers than Lillee.
Maybe the last didn't have his accuracy but they all bowled reverse-swing - Lillee picked-up, what, 3 wickets in his career in the subcontinent?
God, why did this thing have to be dug-up!!!!! Now I've gotta explain myself to the latecomers.Swervy said:reverse swing...or conventional in-swing????
Lillee could swing the ball and cut it off the wicket like nobodys business.So what if Lillee didnt get many subcontinent wickets, he hardly played there. SF barnes didnt take any wickets on the sub continent..and yet everyone is up his **** (the fact he didnt play there is not the point!!! ).
Hadlee and Lillee were similar-ish type of bowlers ,both equally effective..both all time greats.
and Marshall was right up there on a level pegging.
This notion that you have to have reverse swing to be a good bowler winds me up...there are other waepons a fast bowler can use,and Lillee had just about all of them.