• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Who is a better batsman Martyn or Chanderpaul?

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Pratyush said:
And some people did give reasons this - Tendulkar vs Australia and others for Tendulkar's selection in another thread Marc is speaking about. Just that people arent willing to accept others can have alternate view points.
Says the person who jumped on people for daring to say Tendulkar was out of form and twisted their words completely to put in his signature.
 

Pratters

Cricket, Lovely Cricket
marc71178 said:
Says the person who jumped on people for daring to say Tendulkar was out of form and twisted their words completely to put in his signature.
Oh yes I saw that one coming. Refuse see some one else's point and then start labelling people and and refuse to accept earlier made remarks calling them twisted. 8-)

Really dude, you have issues with Tendulkar and me and you can carry to have them. I have no qualms. Tendulkar is out of form. You have been jumping on me and its not the other way around. Bah.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
So I'm the one who completely twisted words that several people have said and put them in my signature then?
 

Pratters

Cricket, Lovely Cricket
marc71178 said:
So I'm the one who completely twisted words that several people have said and put them in my signature then?
Let me get this clear. Several people have said Tendulkar is past his best. You have not said Tendulkar is past his best. So you feel it should not be quoted in your signature. Why do I clearly remember you saying/endorsing that view point then?

Still I am not going to sift through all your posts to find your quote. If you feel, and mention speciically, I will remove it from my signature. Otherwise, no.
 
Last edited:

Pratters

Cricket, Lovely Cricket
marc71178 said:
So I'm the one who completely twisted words that several people have said and put them in my signature then?
No but you did jump on me in threads, just because you dont have a similar view as mine.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Pratyush said:
Let me get this clear. Several people have said Tendulkar is past his best. You have not said Tendulkar is past his best. So you feel it should not be quoted in your signature. Why do I clearly remember you saying/endorsing that view point then?

Still I am not going to sift through all your posts to find your quote. If you feel, and mention speciically, I will remove it from my signature. Otherwise, no.
Put what you like in your signature.

However if you choose to misrepresent what people have said then the only person it relfects badly on is you.
 

Pratters

Cricket, Lovely Cricket
marc71178 said:
Put what you like in your signature.

However if you choose to misrepresent what people have said then the only person it relfects badly on is you.
Okay you didnt say/endorse the view Tendulkar is past his best? :D
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
If you can show me where I've supposedly said it for you to quote it (or Deja Moo for that matter) then I'll suggest you're making things up.
 

Pratters

Cricket, Lovely Cricket
marc71178 said:
If you can show me where I've supposedly said it for you to quote it (or Deja Moo for that matter) then I'll suggest you're making things up.
Oh you didnt oppose the ignature for 6 months or so and now expect me to sift through your 35000 or so posts as you suddenly feel some thing? A joke indeed.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Pratyush said:
Oh you didnt oppose the ignature for 6 months or so and now expect me to sift through your 35000 or so posts as you suddenly feel some thing? A joke indeed.
No, I've objected to it right from the start, but if it makes you happy to completely misquote what people have said then that's up to you.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Pratyush said:
Why, because you can cut one post out of the entire discussion and make it look bad?

Pratyush said:
Now what should I suggest regarding you debating on some thing before and then backtracking, you only decide. :dry:
I suggest you post the entire discussion, because IIRC you were the one who brought the whole thing up about him being past it - I have never said it.
 

Pratters

Cricket, Lovely Cricket
marc71178 said:
I suggest you post the entire discussion, because IIRC you were the one who brought the whole thing up about him being past it - I have never said it.
Wow so if you oppose some thing which I brought up, does not mean you have a stance on it, just because I brought it up (not implying who brought it up).

The link is quite clear and no, you didnt object to the signature before this and over some time the stance has been quite clear according to me. I see you change it then.

And why is that not a surprise.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
No, the link is not clear - it is one isolated post where I haven't actually said anything that you've quoted me as saying.

I did pass comment at the time about it being wrong as I never said it.
 

Pratters

Cricket, Lovely Cricket
marc71178 said:
No, the link is not clear - it is one isolated post where I haven't actually said anything that you've quoted me as saying.

I did pass comment at the time about it being wrong as I never said it.
It looked clearly that you agreed to it. And I never found you raising objection over it for the past six months regarding my signature.

It was hardly me 'making things up'.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
No, I commented on it, and you ignored the comments.

And it's making things up as neither of us have ever said what we're being quoted as saying.
 

Pratters

Cricket, Lovely Cricket
In any case as you do not say it now I remove your name from my signature. Alleging me of making things up is a wrong way to look at it. I did not 'chose' to ignore an of your comments. I may have overlooked any which you may have mentioned.

You have always argued with me on Tendulkar and the main point raised by me. So there was no reason to believe you not believing otherwise.

End of matter/
 

Top