Sudeep
International Captain
That being said despite Yuvraj having played only four Tests, and Flintoff having improved eons in the last year?chicane said:Yuvi is better with the bat and in the field.
That being said despite Yuvraj having played only four Tests, and Flintoff having improved eons in the last year?chicane said:Yuvi is better with the bat and in the field.
Interesting comment, considering Yuvraj has picked up a grand total of ONE wicket.chicane said:In tests Yuvi can bowl a few tight overs and maybe even break partnerships. He's pretty handy.
I said MAYBE. Hope you can read it now.Sudeep said:Interesting comment, considering Yuvraj has picked up a grand total of ONE wicket.
So what? Yuvraj is far more talented with the bat. If he fails in tests like you're hoping for, we'll see then.Sudeep said:That being said despite Yuvraj having played only four Tests, and Flintoff having improved eons in the last year?
Yes, that's the point I'm arguing.chicane said:I said MAYBE. Hope you can read it now.![]()
And far more unreliable because of his style.chicane said:So what? Yuvraj is far more talented with the bat. If he fails in tests like you're hoping for, we'll see then.
What the hell's there to argue about? Why can't he break partnerships?Sudeep said:Yes, that's the point I'm arguing.
On what basis are you saying MAYBE?
LOL.chicane said:What the hell's there to argue about? Why can't he break partnerships?
LOL and Flintoff's power play has been ultra relaible till recently has it?Sudeep said:And far more unreliable because of his style.
Is it just me or Flintoff really seems really good at defence too?chicane said:LOL and Flintoff's power play has been ultra relaible till recently has it?Don't write Yuvraj off so blatantly without having any clue about his enormous talent, and there's a very good chance he'll suceed.
He's shown his wicket taking ability in ODIs whenever given the opportunity. What the hell do you expect given he's been sparingly used over 4 tests?Sudeep said:LOL.
I see a different point there.
Why can he?
![]()
ODIs and Tests - two completely different formats.chicane said:He's shown his wicket taking ability in ODIs whenever given the opportunity. What the hell do you expect given he's been sparingly used over 4 tests?
Recently? Yeah he's been outstanding. So what's your point man? Yuvraj has a sound technique as well.Sudeep said:Is it just me or Flintoff really seems really good at defence too?
Not as sound as Flintoff, IMO.chicane said:Recently? Yeah he's been outstanding. So what's your point man? Yuvraj has a sound technique as well.
Oh it makes such a difference to a part time SLA doesn't it?Sudeep said:ODIs and Tests - two completely different formats.![]()
In your opinion, which obviously speaks of how blind you've been while watching(if at all) Yuvi bat.Sudeep said:Not as sound as Flintoff, IMO.
Occasionally.chicane said:Oh it makes such a difference to a part time SLA doesn't it?Care to explain what? There will be slight difference but what you needed to understand from that was he is pretty tidy and he could occasionaly break partnerships.
Yes, we'll see how sound he is, when he opens against the likes of McGrath, Gillespie and Lee.chicane said:In your opinion, which obviously speaks of how blind you've been while watching(if at all) Yuvi bat.
So can you please point out where I said Yuvraj is better than Flintoff at that? I only said he's a more talented batsman and one of the best fielders in the world, at the same time is handy with the ball.Sudeep said:Occasionally.
Not regularly as Flintoff.
And that's the arguement for picking Flintoff for Yuvraj.
IMO,chicane said:So can you please point out where I said Yuvraj is better than Flintoff at that? I only said he's a more talented batsman and one of the best fielders in the world, at the same time is handy with the ball.