But Fighting?orangepitch said:India vs Australia first test in Mumbai 2001. The batsman was Dravid and the umpire Venkatraghavan.
Slaters outburst was sickening .
LOL. Don't worry, I'm his biggest detractor - and with good reason I reckon. He doesn't swing the red ball unless it is brand new (and even then struggles), bowls with a flat, skiddy trajectory rather than using his height to gain bounce and trouble batsmen. But the thing that annoys me the most is that he bowls around the wicket if the ball is not swinging, which effectively gives him the same angle as a right armer, negating his main advantage - variation.Mr. Ponting said:NO! I don't want to bring it up again, but NOT BRACKEN!
Nope.marc71178 said:But Fighting?
I don't think so.
Oh, I agree. He was extremely silly at best.Sehwag309 said:I don't think it soured any relations, but slater's action was uncalled for. I don't know why he was arguing with dravid even after the green light.
Look like McGrath had to say a few words as wellluckyeddie said:Oh, I agree. He was extremely silly at best.
Dont put a spin on it.Scallywag said:Slater was shrugging his shoulders, meaning he did not know if it was a catch, you dont open your arms and turn your wrists when arguing. If Slater was pointing or raising a fist I would agree with you but he does not act threatening at all and it looks like both had something to say without any problem.
As opposed to picking up their aluminium bat and throwing it home.Dennis Lillee was less soothing, telling The West Australian paper: "I was brought up to be wary of people who pick up their bat and go home.
Yeah Nicholson or Cleary.Andre said:LOL. Don't worry, I'm his biggest detractor - and with good reason I reckon. He doesn't swing the red ball unless it is brand new (and even then struggles), bowls with a flat, skiddy trajectory rather than using his height to gain bounce and trouble batsmen. But the thing that annoys me the most is that he bowls around the wicket if the ball is not swinging, which effectively gives him the same angle as a right armer, negating his main advantage - variation.
For mine, I'd pick Nicholson.
Amen to that.Mr. Ponting said:Yeah Nicholson or Cleary.
Cleary is a personal fave cricketer of mine
Me too! Seems Cleary is a bit of a favourite around here He WILL do wellAUST_HiTMaN said:Amen to that.
Cleary is awsome, my equal favourite aswell, along with a couple of others.
Says Who, ACB ? Yeah Right I believe them.marc71178 said:Right - Warne and Waugh took money for weather forecasting - naive yes, cheating no?
Well that means the Aussie players do try to cheat at times by claiming catches, How many times have we seen Aussie fans calling that fielder as 'Cheat'. As for warnie, Didn't he take a banned substance before the world Cup despite being given a list of all the banned substance by Cricket Australia ??marc71178 said:Can you please prove to me that Warne has taken any performance enhancing drug, or would you prefer to retract that one?
Slater isn't the only one to ever claim a catch that may not have carried, and I firmly believe that when it's that close, the fielder doesn't necessarily know it didn't carry. And "fighting with the umpire" - as with Warne, I assume you can prove this?