Not sure if Warne will get 12 wickets. His fingers won't be as nimble as usual because he hasn't had the hand free to send all those text messages.Scallywag said:Warne will take twelve wickets and murali will be banned for life so the universe is balanced again, it is written.
What about 11, as is required?Mister Wright said:Not sure if Warne will get 12 wickets.
Read the whole post - it was a joke. For those to slow to get it, it was in reference to his previous mistakes with his mobile phone.Gaijin-san said:What about 11, as is required?
Honestly I couldn't care less if Warne got the wickets or not. There are more important important things in this world to worry about.Gaijin-san said:I got the joke. Ha ha. Happy?
I don't see what that has to do with my post.Mister Wright said:Honestly I couldn't care less if Warne got the wickets or not. There are more important important things in this world to worry about.
Linda said:Like how many centuries Marto will score this series, for one.
Because the NT is a territory and not a state it is run by the Chief Minister. The ACT also has one.Slow Love™ said:Incidentally, I had to laugh when I heard who the Sri Lankans' first tour match is against - the Northern Territory Chief Minister's XI. Must be my ignorance of territory politics, but who the hell is the Chief Minister? Is it like a Premier?
ps: This thread should probably get sticked now, 'cause the tour starts today.
doubt it.....SL are a very poor team outside the sub continent even with murali in the side so i expect a 2-0 victory from australia. as far as vaas goes id be very surprised if he got into double figs in terms of wickets.Slow Love™ said:Back to topic - does anybody think that Sri Lanka poses a threat to the Australians in this series? Obviously, given Murali's withdrawal, people are treating it as a bit of a walkover, but two test series can be VERY dangerous (ask the South Africans) - one good performance by the Sri Lankans, and you never know. The Aussies are a little underdone with both confidence and injury issues, and the Lankans have a lot to play for.
It is not a misspelling. In fact, both Muralitharan and Muralidharan are perfectly acceptable in Tamil.Waughney said:Murali to "tour" Australia I don't know how many times I've seen Muralitharan spelt Muralidharan
and in english the above is spelt 'J e a l o u s y'Scallywag said:In english its spelt c h u c k e r