• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Ranking the Batsmen

Johnners

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Ask yourself though has Tendulkar won/saved as many games for India as Lara has singlehandedly for West Indies?
 

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
Clapo said:
Ask yourself though has Tendulkar won/saved as many games for India as Lara has singlehandedly for West Indies?
Ask yourself if Tendy has ever had a combination like Amrbose/Walsh as his bowlers?
 

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
And FYI, Lara averages 61 in matches won, while Tendulkar averages 64 in matches won. So they contribute in similarly in wins.
 

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
silentstriker said:
Ask yourself if Tendy has ever had a combination like Amrbose/Walsh as his bowlers?
India would have taken Ian Bishop with open arms, even knowing his career would be ruined by injury!
 

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
Jono said:
India would have taken Ian Bishop with open arms, even knowing his career would be ruined by injury!
Yea, its ludicrous to compare 'matches won' considering what type of pace bowlers he had to work with.

We all know how important bowling is to winning (cough, Ashes, cough).

I am not dismissing Lara, and I will vote for him as soon as Sachin gets in because IMO there isn't all that much to separate them. But personally, he wins out because of consistency. Though I have a feeling that if I was born in West INdies, I might go Lara. But hopefully, if I was born in a neutral place, I'd still go Sachin...but who knows?
 

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
silentstriker said:
Yea, its ludicrous to compare 'matches won' considering what type of pace bowlers he had to work with.

We all know how important bowling is to winning (cough, Ashes, cough).

I am not dismissing Lara, and I will vote for him as soon as Sachin gets in because IMO there isn't all that much to separate them. But personally, he wins out because of consistency. Though I have a feeling that if I was born in West INdies, I might go Lara. But hopefully, if I was born in a neutral place, I'd still go Sachin...but who knows?
But in the mean time, vote in Sir Viv before them. :p
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
silentstriker said:
Ask yourself if Tendy has ever had a combination like Amrbose/Walsh as his bowlers?
Ask yourself if Lara has had Kumble with a couple of other decent to very good spinners to win matches at home every single match he has played at home throughout his career?
 

adharcric

International Coach
honestbharani said:
Ask yourself if Lara has had Kumble with a couple of other decent to very good spinners to win matches at home every single match he has played at home throughout his career?
Well, Ambrose and Walsh performed home and away, as opposed to the Indian spinners. In short, this can go on forever and ever. Both played in generally mediocre teams.
IMO, Lara and Tendulkar are pretty much equal; who you rate higher depends on whether you prefer consistency (SRT) or massive scores (BCL).
 
Last edited:

adharcric

International Coach
adharcric said:
Well, Ambrose and Walsh performed home and away, as opposed to the Indian spinners. In short, this can go on forever and ever.
IMO, Lara and Tendulkar are pretty much equal; who you rate higher depends on whether you prefer consistency (SRT) or massive scores (BCL).
Now, we decided earlier to keep this thread (and the parallel thread) clear of Warne-Murali or Lara-Tendulkar debate, so let's stick to that and not clog this up too much.
 

Top