Mr Mxyzptlk
Request Your Custom Title Now!
And that he's what... about 72 years old?age_master said:yeah the crowd certainly loved that, he did well considering he hasn't played in a year
And that he's what... about 72 years old?age_master said:yeah the crowd certainly loved that, he did well considering he hasn't played in a year
You're a strange one Richard. As opposed to good old English technique? They time the ball very well, slogging (in my mind at least) refers to swinging the bat without any regard for where you might be attempting to hit it. I think you'll find that these two know exactly where it's going most of the time they are batting - like any other batsman.Richard said:To be one of the greatest games in history it would need some competetive meaning for mine.
I might also add that a slogfest such as that which those two would probably engage in would actually denegrate, not raise, the quality of viewing.
It is boring watching Gilchrist score so quickly with a dazzling array of shots. Bring back Geoffrey Boycott and we can all have our socks knocked off at the rate of a run an hour.Richard said:Yep - boring, monotonous, same-same-same thing.
If he'd have skied one, though - great.
Why? A lot of your posts are based on them.Richard said:Exactly - I don't like anomalies.
It's like - he plays a way no-one has a right to play - consistently.
It just baffles me how much he gets away with it.
Sorry if that seems "purist" or whatsits, but that's just the way it is.
Hahaha, I was going to suggest the very same, but thought I'd better keep it to myself!Richard said:I'd probably like him if he was English.
Just call it jealousy - something I'm normally not accusable of.
It just irks me - he epitomises the "we can do anything" nature of the Australia current (not in his personal agenda, I've nothing but admiration for his walking and humility - simply in the way he bats). And I don't like that.
Really? Hmmm, nup can't think of a time when it's done that for me yet!Mister Wright said:Yeah, but it kinda gets frustrating when Gilchrist turns a contest into a slaughter.
Yeh, many Aussies tend to suffer from that syndrome.Son Of Coco said:Really? Hmmm, nup can't think of a time when it's done that for me yet!
hahahaha............. um, cricket isn't that serious...Richard said:There is no competetive element to these matches - the players are not taking it seriously.
ODIs are matches that should be taken with the utmost severity at all times.
haha, 'ok, now heel down and ..............grind, grind, grind'Mr Mxyzptlk said:Yeh, many Aussies tend to suffer from that syndrome.
What's the difference between slogging and 'improvisation'? I've often seen Gilchrist hit the ball very hard, but I've rarely seen him resort to out and out slogging. I think the difference in this case is who we're referring to and whether you like them or not.Richard said:Hmm... a few, of course, but mostly it was simply clean cricket-shots with a bit of improvisation (often coming down the wicket).
Even if it had been a simple slogfest it'd still have been far, far greater than any innings I've ever seen.
A stonewall is also known as blocking the **** out of it in layman's terms.Richard said:What the hell you mean by a stonewall I'm not sure.
But most things are preferable to a slogfest.
don't hold us all responsible for one clown.nookie_lk said:the good old australian spirit !!!!
I wasn't aware that we were talking strictly about one-dayers. If that's the case then everyone's guilty of slogging.zinzan12 said:His dismissal last nite was a slog wasn't it?
I haven't watched last night's first innings yet, but I have definately seen him out slogging in the one-dayers on a few occasions. I'm not being sensitive, just stating my opinion. One-dayers are a slogfest at the start and end of the innings, I had presumed that the original post was referring more to Gilchrist in tests - rightly or wrongly.zinzan12 said:Don't be so sensitive...Even Gilchrist can play an ugly slog once in a while...in fact i'm sure even the great Don played the odd ugly slog-shot.
I take your point though, generally there is no way you could describe Gilchrist as a slogger. He's generally just a great stokemaker.
However you must accept that last nite he was nicked out slogging
Crazy Sam said:no, ROW v Asia is fine. Keep in mind that the Asian team had Tendulkar and Akhtar out with injury. Also, Attapattu had to withdraw at the last moment, and I'm not sure why Afridi wasn't picked.
Oh, he's popular alright, but the problem is he's also past it.age_master said:hehe at full strength the ROW line up would have been even stronger, but it was good to have Gough out there, hes pretty popular out here and represents England in a world wide fundraiser.
I could see it, and I'd actually look to try and bat Flintoff at 5 (which is where he's been so good this year - I do believe he actually got to number 2 batsman in the World briefly from there), with Cairns at 7 or 8.Tim said:There could be reason to play both Flintoff & Cairns.