The bloke can bowl anywhere. Just look at his performances for Australia when Warne was injured in 2000/01 and when suspended in 2003/04.Top_Cat said:All those who said MacGill couldn't bowl outside of the SCG, eat your words.
Yeah, I reckon, he's a quality bowler that is for sure.Top_Cat said:All those who said MacGill couldn't bowl outside of the SCG, eat your words.
You only have to tell the West Indian batsmen it might spin and they'll collapse in a heap. I wouldn't be investing too much in this.Top_Cat said:All those who said MacGill couldn't bowl outside of the SCG, eat your words.
Top respect to England for figuring out how to dismantle the unpenetrable then. You must've cried when Australia lost the Ashes. Salty salty tears.ClownSymonds said:Haha, I love it. Fortress Australia is still absolutely impenetrable. Ramdin's wicket was enjoyable. He was left layed out on the ground contemplating his embarassment.
I think that was his point, that Australia got beaten overseas, but not here. Hence "fortress Australia".Mr Mxyzptlk said:Top respect to England for figuring out how to dismantle the unpenetrable then. You must've cried when Australia lost the Ashes. Salty salty tears.
except that he's got 170 odd wickets in 35 tests.Mr Mxyzptlk said:You only have to tell the West Indian batsmen it might spin and they'll collapse in a heap. I wouldn't be investing too much in this.
Yes, as someone just said, I meant that Australia are still unbeatable at home. It was a shame that Australia lost the Ashes, but at least they didn't lose them to England. They lost them to misfortune.Mr Mxyzptlk said:Top respect to England for figuring out how to dismantle the unpenetrable then. You must've cried when Australia lost the Ashes. Salty salty tears.
Lloyd, Roberts, Holding, Garner, Richards, Marshall, Ambrose, Walsh retiredir0n desi said:Whats wrong with West Indies? Why are they performing so poor?
the talent is their, but they are just not clicking as a unitir0n desi said:Whats wrong with West Indies? Why are they performing so poor?
Yes, obviously. If Hussey fails here, he might end up being a permanent fill in at best. It's also essential for Symonds to do well here, as he might be dropped in favor of a 5th bowler and never given another chance at tests.aussie said:this is an important innings for Hussey future as a test player IMO especially with Langer probably for Adelaide & Jaques plundering runs. If he makes a big score here at least i think he may cement his place as the next opener, but if not Jaques will get it he may have to wait a while to play tests again...
i wouldn't say he'll become a fill in but he will have to wait to become a permanent opener whenever Langer/Hayden reire or begin to fail, because i see down the line Jaques/Hussey opening for Australia.ClownSymonds said:Yes, obviously. If Hussey fails here, he might end up being a permanent fill in at best. It's also essential for Symonds to do well here, as he might be dropped in favor of a 5th bowler and never given another chance at tests.
Maybe, since Hussey's a few years younger than Langer and Hayden. I would think that David Hussey should be given a chance soon as well.aussie said:i wouldn't say he'll become a fill in but he will have to wait to become a permanent opener whenever Langer/Hayden reire or begin to fail, because i see down the line Jaques/Hussey opening for Australia.