Only 1 and a half batsmen out thoughTwo wickets in the first 45 minutes.
No more please.
He was a top 3 batsman before he played for England. Imagine most of his FC runs come from top 3 batting for Worcs.Just bizarre. Weirdest number 3 promotion since Flemo sent Kyle Mills into face Steyn and Ntini in 06.
TBF he looked better than BrookSo ends the Moeen-at-three experiment.
1 less batting partner before Stokes is left stranded.Only 1 and a half batsmen out though
Bloke averages about 15 in his last 4 years of Test cricket. He’s a hack, promoting him way dumber than just sending Brook out.He was a top 3 batsman before he played for England. Imagine most of his FC runs come from top 3 batting for Worcs.
Brook is never a 3 looked like a rabbit in the headlights in the first innings.
I get the decision was harsh making Brook bat 3 to be honest.
That is ridiculous from Root mind.
Will finally answer the age-old question "What if Martin Guptill had played 70 tests?"England play enough tests that this will actually serve as a decent experiment to see if you can brute force someone to a decent test record through very regular exposure the way you can in FC.
FC sides often have relatively talented guys who nonetheless aren't good enough in them for ages because they have less options than an international side, and those guys through enough brute force exposure can cobble together some results.
England are basically doing that with Crawley. Bro is gonna leave with 70 tests, two or three double tons and an average of 27.
I'll always blindly believe that Gup could have averaged 40-odd at number five, and no one can definitively prove me wrong.Will finally answer the age-old question "What if Martin Guptill had played 70 tests?"
He still managed to have a long enough career to play 47 tests for NZ which is about the same as playing 100 for England.Will finally answer the age-old question "What if Martin Guptill had played 70 tests?"