dontcloseyoureyes
BARNES OUT
Actually you know womens tennis is weak when Elena Dementieva was two wins away from being world number 1, im 100% serious when I say if i played a match against her I'd go close to breaking her serve.
Actually you know womens tennis is weak when Elena Dementieva was two wins away from being world number 1, im 100% serious when I say if i played a match against her I'd go close to breaking her serve.
Women aren't playing against men, so what you are saying is really a moot point and I am not really arguing it. Women generally can't compete with men in any physical sport, doesn't mean that they can't offer the same quality.you can say it was more of a battle than the men's match, you can also argue that it made for more compelling viewing because of that(not so for me but i would be able to see where you are coming from) but as to quality, women's tennis is eons behind the men's and serena williams at her best would be beaten quite handily by a guy ranked 50 on the atp tour...
But Jono, hasn't that been true for Men's Tennis as well ? How many people really thought that Andy Murray was going to beat Roger in the Finals. Heck Borg predicted a year ago that Rafa was going to win the 2008 Wimbledon finals.You don't like Serena though. You say the same thing every time she plays (and generally wins)! The exact same predictability existed with Henin in 2003 and at various French Opens.
Thanks for the Laughs.Actually you know womens tennis is weak when Elena Dementieva was two wins away from being world number 1, im 100% serious when I say if i played a match against her I'd go close to breaking her serve.
I know I'm a little late in replying but to be honest I agree - I found the women's final a much more entertaining battle than the mens' in which Federer, bar a period midway through the second set, was easily the dominant player.Well there are lot of matches that you know the outcome already yet they can be a lot more entertaining.
For my money in the 2008 US OPEN, Women's Final >>>>>>>>>> Men's Final.
i certainly don't like what i've seen of serena as a person and while i admire her athletic skills and her fighting spirit as a player, her general on-court demeanour and post-match comments completely put me off....i like the kind of tennis where deft tennis skills, great courtcraft and natural instinct and touch(like a henin or a hingis or a navratilova or a mauresmo(when she plays well) or an edberg or a rafter or a mcenroe or a federer or a sampras for examples) dominate more than raw power or the monotonous back-and-forth of baseline drones...this women's final was tremendous power vs baseline side-to-side retrieving skills, neither enthuses me as a spectacle and however well jankovic fought, the result was a given for me so i watched only part of it and was bored even by that...You don't like Serena though. You say the same thing every time she plays (and generally wins)! The exact same predictability existed with Henin in 2003 and at various French Opens.
if the ability is not the same and it's clearly not, then where does the same or superior quality come into the picture? what exactly do you mean by quality here? is it the winners to errors ratio on the women's side compared to the men's? i have enjoyed a few women's tennis matches more than some of the really error-filled men's matches but i don't see a huge difference in stats while comparing these two matches...Women aren't playing against men, so what you are saying is really a moot point and I am not really arguing it. Women generally can't compete with men in any physical sport, doesn't mean that they can't offer the same quality.
Fantastic .
he's pretty raw, remember when he blasted Roddick off the court in the 05 US Open semi when he was the defending champ. Was awesome to watch. Then got beaten by Hewitt in the semi.Fantastic .
Never really rated Johansson too highly, and he's getting a bit long in the tooth. Unsure how he's going to go.