Pratters
Cricket, Lovely Cricket
Based on what bias of yours?Sanz said:IMO that's debatable @ best .
Based on what bias of yours?Sanz said:IMO that's debatable @ best .
May be that's because someone logically tried to explain why it was not possible for SRT to play the way I suggested/expected him to.Pratyush said:You first suggest some one to go back and watch the inning and now you seem to have little idea of that knock by saying you could be wrong on this one.
Again, it doesnt surprise me.
That there could have been a snick..which the snickometer could have detected if there was one..Pratyush said:Based on what bias of yours?
Maybe it was because you jumped the gun just because it was Tendulkar. Its certainly foolish to go on talking nonsense when Tendulkar is out before understanding things properly like you did.Sanz said:May be that's because someone logically tried to explain why it was not possible for SRT to play the way I suggested/expected him to.
One thing Sanz, have you actually watched what you are talking about?Sanz said:That there could have been a snick..which the snickometer could have detected if there was one..
Looking at the way you post here I would assume that you did that knowingly in order to win the argument..hence a LIE.Pratyush said:Those links shows you acknowledged Tendulkar in his first two innings. So I was wrong there. Nit lying as lying is knowing and then speaking differently.
I just said that 'He choked' and then all the Blind SRT supporters jumped on to defend him..I had to respond..But you kept on barraging on Tendulkar when he failed expecting too much of him like a fool.
Because Dravid just proved to all of us in the series(like many time in recent years)..that he isn't as opposed to SRT..who kept failing every time there was a slight amount of pressure. Beside I was discussing SRT, not Dravid. Do you guys praise Dravid every time you praise SRT ? But let me guess It's okay to SRT Blind supporters to praise him alone but it's not okay to criticize him alone and someone else must be mentioned everytime there is a criticism of GOD.You miss the point. You brought out averages to show Tendulkar is a choker. Some one (Sudeep or Jono) brought out worse averages for Dravid. But you never cried out Dravid is a choker but you did cry out that Tendulkar is a choker. Bias? Yes.
Keep ranting..have already answered that..And any one needs to prove that why exactly. You are strong in your beliefs so Tendulkar scoring runs in the future will not prove you wrong or right that Tendulkar is a choker, selfish, immoral.
If you have followed the discussion then you would have known that I have said it many times in the past that post 2000/01, SRT has been very inconsistent in pressure games..Obviously no one can lay a hand on his pre-2000/01 career where he simply was the player of the decade.You will change your opinion to 'he can play in pressure situations?' And we of course havet seen that through his career have we.
Once again. assumptions...I have no reason to be biased against SRT..Perhaps you have (to defend him) because he is your hero and you feel threatened every time someone questions his performance.Pratyush said:Maybe it was because you jumped the gun just because it was Tendulkar. Its certainly foolish to go on talking nonsense when Tendulkar is out before understanding things properly like you did.
I dont lie. Thats your speciality as I have shown in another thread a few days back.Sanz said:Looking at the way you post here I would assume that you did that knowingly in order to win the argument..hence a LIE.
Have you ?? Just to answer your question though - YESPratyush said:One thing Sanz, have you actually watched what you are talking about?
I just said that 'He choked' and then all the Blind SRT supporters jumped on to defend him..I had to respond..So you did keep barraging like I said.
Obviously you wont like TRUTH.Pratyush said:I dont like.
Tendulkar cannot prove by his innings in the future that he is moral or stuff like that which you accuse him of.Sanz said:Keep ranting..have already answered that..
Only after blind SRT supporters started the barraging...Pratyush said:all the Blind SRT supporters jumped on to defend him..
So you did keep barraging like I said.
He sure can prove that he is not a CHOKER.Pratyush said:Tendulkar cannot prove by his innings in the future that he is moral or stuff like that which you accuse him of.
You started by sayin Choker Chokes again. Then you gave a logic of poor averages of Tendulkar. Some one showed that Dravid too has poor averages in similar situations.Sanz said:Because blahblah blah.
Well you have yourself said that he was superb earlier in his career. So he has proven he is not a choker.Sanz said:He sure can prove that he is not a CHOKER.
Clearly ignoring the part where I said I had shown you had lied in the other thread and quite blatantly at that.Sanz said:Obviously you wont like TRUTH.
That is debatable. Lara in my opinion could be the worthy player of the decade candidate.Sanz said:If you have followed the discussion then you would have known that I have said it many times in the past that post 2000/01, SRT has been very inconsistent in pressure games..Obviously no one can lay a hand on his pre-2000/01 career where he simply was the player of the decade.
First get the sequence right.. I said 'choker chokes again..' and then you barragged in your post...You can conclude whatever you want..everyone knows how you respect SRT and that he is your hero. I know I am not biased..and that is enough for me. If you think I am then please continue to believe so..I know I cant help clear that doubt from your mind unless I bow the GOD and pray 5 times a day.Pratyush said:You started by sayin Choker Chokes again. Then you gave a logic of poor averages of Tendulkar. Some one showed that Dravid too has poor averages in similar situations.
Then only thing to conclude is that you were biased.
Else why would you not go shouting Choker Chokes again when Dravid would score less runs? Applying different standards for different players then.