Fully agree with the above post. It was an experiment. period. Just as the experiment to send him at number three. The only difference is that the latter succeeded while the former didn't.
I don't really know the reaction back home, but judging by indiatimes latest slideshow, I'm disgusted - by the reaction of the kolkata crowd and the slideshow itself. And I must vent out some anger. The slideshow is so obviously a case of a seemingly harmless gesture blown out of proportion by a blatantly biased media.
http://cricket.indiatimes.com/quickiearticleshow/1308869.cms
"Even on the Eden Gardens cricket pitch on Friday, the locals' displeasure with the Australian coach was felt during the fourth ODI against South Africa as constant cries of "Chappell, hai, hai," and "Chappell, go back!" were heard"
Good show, fellow countrymen.
"The pursuit of Excellence now stands in shambles. It also shows Chappell is still seething underneath after the row with Ganguly and with the former captain back in the Test fold it remains to be seen how Chappell handles him. The Aussie coach is definitely feeling the heat."
Go ahead and break your own side's confidence.
"By his extravagantly tasteless gesture, the Aussie coach has virtually guaranteed that the debate would now be on him rather than the overtly sentimental crowd."
Showing the middle finger when totally irritated, assuming that he did do it, is worse than supporting the otehr side and jeering at your own team even before the match?
"With the Test series against Lanka approaching the pressure on the Indian coach would be immense with Sourav in the team, if there is any reoccurrence of the Zimbabwe incident and e-mail wars then rest assured
the Indian public who until now have backed the Aussie will turn against him, after all who likes a disruptive coach."
And now you're speaking for me?
"
Chappell will have to understand the Indian mindset first before he can start changing Indian cricket and for that to happen
he must stand-by his decision even at the small cost of fan ire."
So, what they're saying exactly is... ?