Poor is an understatement.James90 said:And now Dar gives that? Poor umpiring.
Worst decision you'll ever seeJames90 said:And now Dar gives that? Poor umpiring.
So the fact that it was missing leg by a foot is irrelevant?Isolator said:Uh... it hit him on the full... in line with the stumps.... that's out. OUT.
(this is the Symonds lbw I'm talking about)
I thought it was once it hits you on the full inline?James90 said:So the fact that it was missing leg by a foot is irrelevant?
How can you think that was out? it was swinging down leg easily.Isolator said:Uh... it hit him on the full... in line with the stumps.... that's out. OUT.
(this is the Symonds lbw I'm talking about)
It wasn't out but it really wasn't THAT bad. It's just when you consider all the plumb ones he didn't give. Worst decision I've ever seen was definitely Simon Jones not being given LBW at Edgbaston to Lee. I wish Bowden and Dar were Australian. Then I wouldn't have to watch games they umpire in.mikeW said:Worst decision you'll ever see
Erm no... it was going way down leg side. You're obviously getting confused with the rule in regards to a spinning ball; that if you are hit on the full, the umpire must assume the ball is not going to spin. In this case, Symonds was hit, just in line with leg stump, and it was clearly going down leg side.Isolator said:Uh... it hit him on the full... in line with the stumps.... that's out. OUT.
(this is the Symonds lbw I'm talking about)
lol True that. Hes like graeme hick, has the skills not the mentality for test cricket.TazzX said:Once against Symond prooves that he is a ODI player and not a Test player. He can only perform when there is no pressure on him and he can swing at the ball like a baboon.
No. Once it hits you on the full inline, the umpire has to assume that the ball is going to follow its present line, not that it's going to hit the stumps just because it hits you inline.Arrow said:I thought it was once it hits you on the full inline?
Lets not forget Smith's caught behind and Lee's LBW's that weren't given.TazzX said:Justice has been served. However still think that SA has been hard done by. 3 LBW's that should have been out and 2 lost wickets yesterday. Anyway its the game of cricket and Im loving it right now.
Once against Symond prooves that he is a ODI player and not a Test player. He can only perform when there is no pressure on him and he can swing at the ball like a baboon.
THat's with spinners...if the ball hits you on the full in line with the stumps, the umpires have to assume the ball is going straight on the line of the ball (i.e. disregard any spin that may have occurred had the ball pitched). Symond's LBW was hit in line with leg and clearly the line of the ball was taking it further past leg-stump....although the Aussies can't be too unhappy about that, quite a few very poor decisions have been to their advantage.Arrow said:I thought it was once it hits you on the full inline?