Well start being less one-eyed in complaining about the umpiring then.parttimer said:Bah. I was online and active during the match yesterday. Stop trying to make a mountain out of a molehill.
It was either Healy or possibly Lawry who produced the most laughable piece of commentary of the series during the 2nd test. All the Aussies produced a hysterical appeal for a Gilchrist catch (as is their wont) and the Aussie commentator implied that it must be out because (and I paraphrase) "Gilchrist only appeals when he's certain".Blaze said:Haven't read this thread yet but from what I heard today, the commentary was abysmal.
Ian Healy OUT
Michael Slater IN.
Healy is just a cheerleader for Australia.
Yep. Considering the match situation - very admirable how Nel reacted and kudos to Chappell for pointing it out.Jono said:Dar obviously thought he hit it. Pretty poor decision.
Chapelli's right, Nel took the decision well. He didn't have a cry like Smith did, and he didn't continously ask why like Lee.
2 WI were excellent in last 2 tests.Tim said:Yeah there's been a few shockers in NZ too. The standard seems to have slipped..although I only see NZ & Australian matches so I don't know what its like through the rest of the world.
Yeah, Chappell just needs to pull that broom out of his ***.Pratyush said:R.Ponting and J.Kallis are different kinds of players Mr. Chappell and they play different roles.