So Ponting's captaincy plan is to put himself in the position of another captain - that makes a lot of sense, actually.parttimer said:Hey it worked for Steve Waugh for 17 tests in a row.
I think you'd lasted 5 posts without mentioning that, nice one Scrappyluckyeddie said:So Ponting's captaincy plan is to put himself in the position of another captain - that makes a lot of sense, actually.
Apart from the fact that Steve Waugh wouldn't have said "We'll have a bowl" five minutes after losing his strike bowler in a hopscotch-related incident.
Elliot or Blewett must be due for a recall soon! Or, god help us, Bevo.Josh said:Well with the rate of recycling of the aussie team at the moment, I'd dare say Hodge's career is over.
Yes, I'm surprised it took me so long too.parttimer said:I think you'd lasted 5 posts without mentioning that, nice one Scrappy
Thats harsh, the commentators only realised it had hit the ground after using the super slow mo thing. Tough decisionJosh said:MacGill-Boucher... I can't believe no-one could have seen that hit the ground.
I'm not one that likes to swipe on the umpires but today... that was a bit deplaurable.
He scored a double century not long ago, and the rate of recycling isnt high at allJosh said:Well with the rate of recycling of the aussie team at the moment, I'd dare say Hodge's career is over.
Over the last decade as a whole it isn't high, but since The Ashes it has been pretty high. Katich, Martyn and Clarke gone and replaced and there may be more. Half a batting lineup in 5 months.GoT_SpIn said:He scored a double century not long ago, and the rate of recycling isnt high at all
And Kasper and Gillespie.Scaly piscine said:Katich, Martyn and Clarke gone and replaced and there may be more.
Good knock personally, but it wasn't what the team wanted was it? If he'd scored quicker, and they'd already been ahead of us by that fourth morning, the others wouldn't have had to bat quickly in awful conditions.marc71178 said:A gritty battling innings in fairly tricky conditions against bowlers who'd previously had the wood over him?
There were 1 or 2 others in that match who could've done with playing knocks like that.
He gets the blame, yet when he was dismissed the score was 323-3 (then 4) and the side ended up 367 all out.
What relevence does that have? Rudolph was batting when South Africa were going for a draw, Hayden's side needed to win at The Oval.marc71178 said:
Ahem, did you catch the last two sessions in Melbourne?Tom Halsey said:From an English point of view, this is lovely to see, and I can only hope this form continues into the next Aussie summer.
Agreed, Slater impressed me a lot during the Ashes series, even if he did get a bit excited when it was going Australia's way (Warne getting Strauss out on the 2nd day at Edgebaston comes to mind).Blaze said:Haven't read this thread yet but from what I heard today, the commentary was abysmal.
Ian Healy OUT
Michael Slater IN.
Healy is just a cheerleader for Australia.
Well in the first two matches, South Africa didn't take advantage of good positions, and in the 1st Test Australia failed to finish them off. Australia haven't impressed me this series.Linda said:Ahem, did you catch the last two sessions in Melbourne?
It was the batsmen taking the light, not Hayden's slow knock that cost them that Test (and the series). Either way, you can blame Hayden.Tom Halsey said:Good knock personally, but it wasn't what the team wanted was it? If he'd scored quicker, and they'd already been ahead of us by that fourth morning, the others wouldn't have had to bat quickly in awful conditions.