Langeveldt
Soutie
Interesting, as Atherton found out, they don't miss muchFusion said:Let me paraphrase Mike Atherthon: "The decision Hair made in the context of things was wrong. We have upwards of 26 cameras and we don't miss much"
Interesting, as Atherton found out, they don't miss muchFusion said:Let me paraphrase Mike Atherthon: "The decision Hair made in the context of things was wrong. We have upwards of 26 cameras and we don't miss much"
What would you have them do? Their position, I assume, is that they've been falsely accused of cheating, by one or both umpires. Do you expect them to come back and play, with the same umpire/s, without any sort of acknowledgement of a screw-up and without any sort of apology?BoyBrumby said:I have to say that the Pakistanis have forfeited the moral high ground here. Their grievance may be genuine, but it isn't fair to the crowd or the spirit of the game to attempt to ride roughshod over the umpires. Hair may be wrong (I'll go so far as to say he is), but their actions are nothing short of outrageous, worse because it's calculated & not in the heat of the moment.
Yeah, really made a fool of himself.open365 said:Ramiz Raja is talking complete hog wash.
Yes unfortunately back to the Sheffield Shield for Darrel. A shame really I think Hair is really the only Umpire left who wants to make all decisions on field on the basis of cricketing law rather than have decisions made off the field through political negotiation.Langeveldt said:I think Darrel Hair has just flicked the bails off his career
chalky said:Yes unfortunately back to the Sheffield Shield for Darrel. A shame really I think Hair is really the only Umpire left who wants to make all decisions on field on the basis of cricketing law rather than have decisions made off the field through political negotiation.
Hair > BC Cooray and A de Silvasilentstriker said:Sucks that the biggest disgrace in the history of umpiring will no longer be allowed to umpire.
Langeveldt said:Hair > BC Cooray and A de Silva
Well...if we want to believe this: "No individual has been accused, by the way; Cricinfo have been told by sources inside the Pakistan camp."chalky said:Yes unfortunately back to the Sheffield Shield for Darrel. A shame really I think Hair is really the only Umpire left who wants to make all decisions on field on the basis of cricketing law rather than have decisions made off the field through political negotiation.
Don't forget Javed Ackthar, Merv Kitchen, Darrel Harper and the West Indian who gave Rob Bailey out cought of thigh pad a few years ago.Langeveldt said:Hair > BC Cooray and A de Silva
If it is awarded in this fashion then it's the second strange ending in 2 Oval Tests.Jamee999 said:Bails off. That's it. England may have just won.
Thinking more in terms of not coming out to play and forfeiting the game.Samuel_Vimes said:Well...if we want to believe this: "No individual has been accused, by the way; Cricinfo have been told by sources inside the Pakistan camp."
Then his decision isn't made by the basis of the law, which says that the umpire must observe a fielder damaging the ball to actually punish the fielding team. If he saw that, surely Hair would be the man to accuse someone?