wahindiawah
Banned
Sure i can, but what has this thread to do with it?marc71178 said:So whilst you're here can you give us your opinion on the recently played ODI betwen Bangladesh and India?
Sure i can, but what has this thread to do with it?marc71178 said:So whilst you're here can you give us your opinion on the recently played ODI betwen Bangladesh and India?
Josh said:Brad Haddin and Wade Seccombe are the backup Australian keepers. Justin Langer is not a wicket keeper, and he never will be a wicket keeper because he is not a wicket keeper and Australia would not bring in a non-wicket keeper to be a wicket keeper in a Test Match.
The selectors may be stupid, but not THAT stupid...
Justin langer actually debuted as a wicketkeeper for australia in odi'smarc71178 said:Because, like Younis Khan, Langer is not a wicket keeper!
injuredDydl said:What about Wade Seccombe? I seem to recall him being keeper in Australia A VS India.
Mr Casson said:Been through this - Watson is a far better player in the longer version.
I find it interesting that Katich was left out of a squad of 13, especially with Watson in it. My imagination is running away with me; I'm hoping that Lehmann is dropped and Watson plays as batting cover for him and an extra seam bowling option. You couldn't do worse than Lehmann at the moment for batting, so if you get a bowler out of it as bonus, why not?
He's back this week.Josh said:injured
Yeah in all likelihood the team will be unchanged. As I said, it was just me thinking wishfully. The big clue is that Lehmann is still in the squad. If he was going to be dropped, he'd be out of the squad, end of story.Mister Wright said:I think they have included Watson because if they decide to go with two spinners and therefore drop a paceman they will want Watson as the third seamer, which will mean that Lehmann will be dropped for Watson.
I still think the selectors will go with the same XI.
Yeah, I just hope Watson isn't named 12th man so he can be released to play for Queensland.Mr Casson said:Yeah in all likelihood the team will be unchanged. As I said, it was just me thinking wishfully. The big clue is that Lehmann is still in the squad. If he was going to be dropped, he'd be out of the squad, end of story.
Actually if you checked Langer's profile at cricinfo.com, this is what it would saymarc71178 said:Because, like Younis Khan, Langer is not a wicket keeper!
Yes, but I doubt Langer even keeps a pair of wicketkeeping gloves in his kitbag, and I also doubt he has kept wickets in any form of the game (excluding charity) in the last 5 years.Unattainableguy said:Actually if you checked Langer's profile at cricinfo.com, this is what it would say
Full Name: Justin Lee Langer
Born: 21 November 1970, Perth, Western Australia
Major Teams: Australia, Middlesex, Western Australia.
Batting Style: Left Hand Bat
Bowling Style: Right Arm Medium
Other: Wicketkeeper
Uncle: Langer, RS;
Well, Langer did wicket-keep in the ODI against Sri Lanka in 1994 and caught one catch. The link is on page 94Mister Wright said:Yes, but I doubt Langer even keeps a pair of wicketkeeping gloves in his kitbag, and I also doubt he has kept wickets in any form of the game (excluding charity) in the last 5 years.
And that is 10 years ago.Unattainableguy said:Well, Langer did wicket-keep in the ODI against Sri Lanka in 1994 and caught one catch. The link is on page 94
If they were dropping Lehmann, they wouldn't have picked Watson though would they?Mr Casson said:Yeah in all likelihood the team will be unchanged. As I said, it was just me thinking wishfully. The big clue is that Lehmann is still in the squad. If he was going to be dropped, he'd be out of the squad, end of story.
Trescothick has kept in ODI's, but that doesn't make him anything more than a back-up keeper in an emergency, certainly not one to give the gloves to for a Test!Unattainableguy said:Well, Langer did wicket-keep in the ODI against Sri Lanka in 1994 and caught one catch. The link is on page 94
He wouldn't be a direct replacement for Lehmann, but if they decide to go with 2 spinners then Watson would be likely to replace Lehmann to give Australia a 3rd seamer.marc71178 said:If they were dropping Lehmann, they wouldn't have picked Watson though would they?
The Watson thing's got me - I don't understand it.marc71178 said:If they were dropping Lehmann, they wouldn't have picked Watson though would they?