granted that the pitches are not what they should be, and there is more seam movement available to be exploited than in an ideal situation. However they are no more substandard than those pitches in the recent ODI series Indian v WI, where the wickets were dead as a dodo and 300+ runs were required to be able to defend!!!!!
As has already been stated the preparation for these pitches has been affected by the abnormally wet summer thus far, and consequently they are about 3 - 5 days fresher than would be liked. There is no way that you can claim that these pitches are doctored to suit NZ, when their Test & ODI XI's do not verify those claims!!!!
Bottom line is that the Indian batsmen have failed to make the technical & mental adjustment to the conditions, and as a consequence have gone into their shells. This can be partly blamed on their being spoon fed flat tracks to bat on back home, where seam movement & bounce are basically unheard of. The attitude seems to be that as they are considered so damn good, then if they are not scoring well & winning that something else has to be at fault. Blaming the pitches is a bit of a cop out by the Indians, just the same as the English blaming injuries for their poor performances on the pitch!!!!
For example the Jade pitch did move off the seam with the new ball, and throughout the innings if the bowler bowled into the pitch in order to exploit it. Most of the Kiwi bowlers are able to do so with their height, but the only Indian bowler to do so is Srinath - Khan gets his movement thru the air & the rest bowl along the pitch not into it. NZ had to learn this lesson from the Aussies some years ago & now we see the changes coming thru in both the pitches & types of bowlers. The next step is to get the pitches right with the ball coming onto the bat to improve the batting side of things.
While the Jade pitch was still underdone it was not as bad as the Indian batsmen made it look. They simply could not put a decent innings together and finished at least 50-80 runs short of a competitive total, as it looked to be about a 180 run pitch. We forget we have been spoilt over the last decade, as during the '80's 180 - 230 were frequently winning & defendable scores, and were so during last years VB series in Aus. The fact that NZ scored the required runs inside 27 overs tends to show that a score of 200+ was possible with the right application.
The NZ batsmen are still struggling with their own form and their tail is long & short of batting credentials, but their team effort in the field is the glaring difference between the two sides. This and the fact that the Kiwis still put to gether little partnerships at crucial times to dominate the game, e.g Vincent's running between the wickets, Astle's 22 runs off Srinath & his partnership with Sinclair at Napier.
:P
ooppss - nearly forgot - a quick congrads to AA for his performance with the ball - well done lad.