Mr Mxyzptlk
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Why the hell do you pick Giles if he bowls just 5 overs of 102.4?
Plenty of them would have been in the first hour, too.PY said:27/0 (10 overs) at Lunch.
New Zealand only hit 46 singles in the whole innings. And hit well over 50 fours. I hope England can utilise rotating the strike a lot more.
He bowled 5 overs! I can't help but think that some of you guys call for player sacking simply so you can have a say in everything.chris.hinton said:Giles has got to go?
A bad workman always blames his tools.....Tim said:I gather from newspaper reports that Martin has been struggling with the Duke ball...we use Kookaburra's down in NZ.
But I'm not so sure that's in Giles' control - shouldn't that be pointed squarely at Trescothick?PY said:Think that might be why Chris said it.
What's the point of having a front-line bowler (which he is even though his batting has improved) who only bowls 5 overs out of 100? Seems a waste of time to me, Butcher or Trescothick could have picked up those 5 or Collingwood if he was the replacement for Giles.
I think I'm right in saying that Collingwood is capable of bowling tweakers. Might be worth him practicing those a lot as could be a way into the side in non-spin friendly conditions.
The reason Giles bowled so little was not Trescothick's fault (although he didn't exactly impress me as a captain), it was because he is a feeble bowler who cannot be relied upon and we have better alternatives - therefore Chris is right? Why have a bowler who can only be relied upon to 5 overs an innings?Andre said:But I'm not so sure that's in Giles' control - shouldn't that be pointed squarely at Trescothick?
And wouldn't you think Giles is a feeble bowler because captains like Trescothick have shown little or no confidence in him? I've seen Giles bowl very well at times, when Nasser threw him the ball in a difficult situation or earlier on in his career in ODI's under Alec Stewart. He has the ability to bowl very well at the highest level but is yet to find that confidence from his captain to throw him the ball at any time. Until this is achieved, don't bag Giles, he's just performing like every other human being would who lacked the confidence of the captain.a massive zebra said:The reason Giles bowled so little was not Trescothick's fault (although he didn't exactly impress me as a captain), it was because he is a feeble bowler who cannot be relied upon and we have better alternatives - therefore Chris is right? Why have a bowler who can only be relied upon to 5 overs an innings?
... putting more pressure on Nasser Hussain.Andre said:Well done Andy Strauss!!!
100 on Test debut - at Lords. Take a bow. Here's hoping England have unearthed something special.