It probably cost Freddie his wicket - Cairns out-thought him.Loony BoB said:Gotta wonder about the rotation of the strike, though... it's worse than NZ was earlier this tour (Richardson and someone?).
MoxPearl said:Also
THIS IS WHAT A REAL CRICKET PITCH IS!
If u bat well.. u can get a good score..
But there just enuff in the pitch for the bowler if he bowls well
Based on FC records, and they don't really mean a great deal!Sudeep said:James Franklin seems a decent bat.
The only way he can look that is by actually doing it at Test Level.Sudeep said:And he definitely looks one of those better tailenders, a genuine no. 8 or 9.
Before this series we were told how great the depth of the New Zealand batting was...Loony BoB said:163/1 to 384/10 - that's 221 runs for 9 wickets in a side that has 10 men capable of making decent runs. Ooh, bugger.
_Ed_ said:I think you are underestimating Mills' batting ability - averaging 40odd in FC cricket on NZ's infamously bowler-friendly pitches is certainly not bad.
And the alleged useless Trescothick gets another fifty...Loony BoB said:Strauss is the man out.
Hope it doesn't cause him any further problems though - if he wasn't fit a week ago, he can't really be 100% now!_Ed_ said:Good to see Oram is bowling in this match.
Still over-rated Craig?!tooextracool said:yep 6 50s in his last 6 innings in england.....
no McCullum??????Kent said:Here is NZ's top 12 specialist batting assets IMO. I don't think many would argue that McMillan is now #6 and sliding...
1. Fleming
2. Richardson
3. Astle
4. Styris
5. Papps
6. McMillan
7. Sinclair
8. Marshall
9. Fulton
10. Taylor
11. How
12. Vincent
MoxPearl said:THIS IS WHAT A REAL CRICKET PITCH IS!
If u bat well.. u can get a good score..
been there & done that too bloody often for my liking - better to have someone fit & in form at the start of the tour rather than half way thru' it.........means more competition for places & no chance to rest on your laurels..............Arjun said:Always a good chance for injured/out of form players to return to form, isn't it?
I suggested that.marc71178 said:Well, it was apparently a 500 wicket after the first day...
If NZ get shot out for 120 or so in the second innings will it be criticised?
rather the ENG Ashes tour to AUS qualified you as honorary Kiwis - we did it first remember in RSA in 99/00 just after we last toured ENG & then again in AUS - this is now our 3rd time.......luckyeddie said:Losing so many bowlers on tour, you qualify now as honorory Englishmen.
this is as flat a wicket you'll ever see....dont let the poor batting fool you, 500 was on the cards for NZ, before we saw some horrible strokes from the middle-lower order. perhaps we might see some uneven bounce in days 4 and 5 but thats not an excuse to make up for not scoring enough in the 1st innings.MoxPearl said:well end of day 2...
new zealand bowling alot better than the last test..
i think it was a great day of cricket. even as
Also
THIS IS WHAT A REAL CRICKET PITCH IS!
If u bat well.. u can get a good score..
But there just enuff in the pitch for the bowler if he bowls well