Not a very good second spell from Jones, 35 runs off his last four. To be honest I think he would've been better off sticking with the length he bowled in his opening spell, instead of trying to bowl full. Makes it a lot easier for Hussey especially, IMO.Pratyush said:Agreed it was a full toss but the shot by hussey off jones for 4 was quite magnificent.
DAMN RIGHT.......superkingdave said:Sh*t how f*ckin quick was collingwood there?
Hussey actually dived to try and get in front of Symonds so he would be out instead, quite generous of him really. Australia will probably have to scale back their total a bit now, though Clarke should be able to hit some quick runs.Barney Rubble said:Both batsmen end up at the same end, by the sound of TMS it's Symonds who was out, but Hussey tried to walk and they called him back - it's Symonds who's gone, MASSIVE wicket for England.
Very shrewd from Hussey though, sneaky little b'stard.
Collingwood looks so stiff but oh boy when he moves, its like Toby Maguire turning into Spiderman!Barney Rubble said:Didn't see it but sounds like another piece of lightning-quick Collingwood magic. I swear that guy's not human.
There's no such thing in cricket.aussie said:Symonds will be gutted, he had a hundred for the taking & do you guys realise that ENG could have had a double play just now.
I was thinking exactly the same thing and the stupidity of it!aussie said:Symonds will be gutted, he had a hundred for the taking & do you guys realise that ENG could have had a double play just now.
There was talk of bringing it as one of the stupid innovations.Adamc said:There's no such thing in cricket.
i know mate, but i'm just saying somethingAdamc said:There's no such thing in cricket.