• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** NatWest Series/Challenge

FaaipDeOiad

Hall of Fame Member
Scaly piscine said:
Well Langer only averages about 1 run more than Tresco - obviously Langer has the statistical advantage of not having played against the best Test team.
Langer's average as an opener is over 50. He's also played a total of two tests against Bangladesh, and two against Zimbabwe, while Trescothick inflates his average against weaker sides. I don't think Tresco is a terrible player or anything, but he's not as good as Langer.
 

FaaipDeOiad

Hall of Fame Member
age_master said:
not to mention that he was out run out but yet again the 2rd umpire has called it in...
Disagree. There was doubt, he was not out. Same as the Flintoff stumping the other day.
 

tooextracool

International Coach
luckyeddie said:
Right - because when he comes up against a quality pace attack, he just can't handle it.

Fancy that - only averaging 52 against South Africa - who TEC said would sort him out.

TEC to come back with selective statistics that would be a credit to Richard in 5....4....3....
nope, because his performances against SA in the recent series is inexplicable, considering how edwards and best had worked him out so very recently. his 180 in SA gave hope though, that maybe he might be capable of playing around that weakness, but no one can argue that the aussies have exposed that very same weakness in the last 2 ODIs. that being said, i'd see how he goes till the end of the ODI series, but theres no reason to believe that he will succeed if mcgrath and co continue to expose his technique like they have been for a very long time now.
 

tooextracool

International Coach
Scaly piscine said:
Well Langer only averages about 1 run more than Tresco - obviously Langer has the statistical advantage of not having played against the best Test team.
personally, i'd be surprised if langer had a good ashes series, because i expect hoggard & jones to really cause him problems with the inswinger. langer remember, could barely score a run in the warm up games, the last time he came here.
 

King_Ponting

International Regular
Although langer does sturggle with the inswinger it is something he has been working o during the off season. Langer will be the 3rd highest run scorer in the series for me.
 

FaaipDeOiad

Hall of Fame Member
Bangladesh doing really well so far. Jones did well after his burst of wides, but Gough and Tremlett have taken some stick and Bangladesh are only 1 down. Hopefully they can score 250 odd and make a game of it.
 

luckyeddie

Cricket Web Staff Member
FaaipDeOiad said:
Why bowl Collingwood when you have 5 specialist bowlers? Anyone?
Short memory? Does the phrase "Greatest-ever single all-time One-Day International performance in history" mean anything to you, or are you just an idiot?
 

FaaipDeOiad

Hall of Fame Member
luckyeddie said:
Short memory? Does the phrase "Greatest-ever single all-time One-Day International performance in history" mean anything to you, or are you just an idiot?
Yes... but surely Giles is a better bowler? I was actually asking if the pitch was slow or something by the way, not just deriding Collingwood's abilities with the ball. :p
 

Swervy

International Captain
luckyeddie said:
Short memory? Does the phrase "Greatest-ever single all-time One-Day International performance in history" mean anything to you, or are you just an idiot?
yeah he did a great job of running through the Bangladesh lower order who were chasing 14 rpo :p
 

Top