Neil Pickup
Request Your Custom Title Now!
No he wasn't, hence the not out. It's not rocket science.age_master said:he was quite clearly not over the line when the ball hit the stumps
No he wasn't, hence the not out. It's not rocket science.age_master said:he was quite clearly not over the line when the ball hit the stumps
Langer's average as an opener is over 50. He's also played a total of two tests against Bangladesh, and two against Zimbabwe, while Trescothick inflates his average against weaker sides. I don't think Tresco is a terrible player or anything, but he's not as good as Langer.Scaly piscine said:Well Langer only averages about 1 run more than Tresco - obviously Langer has the statistical advantage of not having played against the best Test team.
Disagree. There was doubt, he was not out. Same as the Flintoff stumping the other day.age_master said:not to mention that he was out run out but yet again the 2rd umpire has called it in...
nope, because his performances against SA in the recent series is inexplicable, considering how edwards and best had worked him out so very recently. his 180 in SA gave hope though, that maybe he might be capable of playing around that weakness, but no one can argue that the aussies have exposed that very same weakness in the last 2 ODIs. that being said, i'd see how he goes till the end of the ODI series, but theres no reason to believe that he will succeed if mcgrath and co continue to expose his technique like they have been for a very long time now.luckyeddie said:Right - because when he comes up against a quality pace attack, he just can't handle it.
Fancy that - only averaging 52 against South Africa - who TEC said would sort him out.
TEC to come back with selective statistics that would be a credit to Richard in 5....4....3....
personally, i'd be surprised if langer had a good ashes series, because i expect hoggard & jones to really cause him problems with the inswinger. langer remember, could barely score a run in the warm up games, the last time he came here.Scaly piscine said:Well Langer only averages about 1 run more than Tresco - obviously Langer has the statistical advantage of not having played against the best Test team.
Yeh they have the lowest toss winning percentage out of all the international teams 41.75%.Dydl said:About 60% of the time, Bangladesh lose the toss!!
97-3, Flintoff perilously close to a hat-trick. Personally I thought that it was nailed-onshaka said:current score: 89/1 in 19.3 overs
Let's say it struck him in front of the outside half of off stumpshaka said:did it strike him "outside off"?
Short memory? Does the phrase "Greatest-ever single all-time One-Day International performance in history" mean anything to you, or are you just an idiot?FaaipDeOiad said:Why bowl Collingwood when you have 5 specialist bowlers? Anyone?
Yes... but surely Giles is a better bowler? I was actually asking if the pitch was slow or something by the way, not just deriding Collingwood's abilities with the ball.luckyeddie said:Short memory? Does the phrase "Greatest-ever single all-time One-Day International performance in history" mean anything to you, or are you just an idiot?
yeah he did a great job of running through the Bangladesh lower order who were chasing 14 rpoluckyeddie said:Short memory? Does the phrase "Greatest-ever single all-time One-Day International performance in history" mean anything to you, or are you just an idiot?