andyc
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
i don't know about you, but i like my maidens to go for no runs, not oneBarney Rubble said:Cheers guys - don't think I was looking too hard!
.
Starts with a maiden - not too bad so far.
i don't know about you, but i like my maidens to go for no runs, not oneBarney Rubble said:Cheers guys - don't think I was looking too hard!
.
Starts with a maiden - not too bad so far.
Cricinfo's mistake - it was a maiden.andyc said:i don't know about you, but i like my maidens to go for no runs, not one
Cricinfo says it was a maiden, as do TMS.......repeatedly......andyc said:i don't know about you, but i like my maidens to go for no runs, not one
End of over 25 (1 run, maiden) Australia 109/3 (RR: 4.36)andyc said:i don't know about you, but i like my maidens to go for no runs, not one
I guess Tres has got to give him the chance after what he did to the Bangles. He did get Mohammad Ashraful out after all, he must be pretty good.......Scaly piscine said:Not sure about bringing Collingwood on really, England have got 5 full-time bowlers who're all doing perfectly well.
I think one of the pacies would have more chance of getting another wicket when aussie are under pressure. Giles is allowing aussie to slowly get back to the grove IMOBarney Rubble said:Cheers guys - don't think I was looking too hard!
.
Starts with a maiden - not too bad so far.
Good point ! .... Take ten and come to the front of the class !!!Adamc said:Better to bring him on sooner rather than later, since Australia will be playing cautiously now having just lost two wickets. If they brought him on when Symonds was settled, he could be expensive; right now, he could probably expect to go for 30 or 40 off his 10 overs.
Fair point, but he's got to bowl the bulk of his overs sometime - and England would, I'm sure, rather it wasn't in the last twelve to fifteen overs.chipmonk said:I think one of the pacies would have more chance of getting another wicket when aussie are under pressure. Giles is allowing aussie to slowly get back to the grove IMO
giles? his 3 overs have gone for 8 runs!chipmonk said:I think one of the pacies would have more chance of getting another wicket when aussie are under pressure. Giles is allowing aussie to slowly get back to the grove IMO
he would have done even better if australia are down 5 wickets when he comes on.andyc said:giles? his 3 overs have gone for 8 runs!
exactly .... england should Shove home the advantage whilst australia are on the back foot .... I think tresco missed the trick here.Scaly piscine said:Too many easy runs off Collingwood as I expected, I just don't see the point in giving a team 6 an over at this point in the game when you've got 5 full time bowlers.
I'd take the lower average and the 3 hundredsLoony BoB said:Just looking at the live career stats - who do you guys think will have a higher average at the end of this series - Pietersen or Hussey? As of this moment...
Code:Name Mat I NO Runs HS Ave 100 50 Ct St MEK Hussey 8 6 5 229 84 229.00 0 2 4 0 KP Pietersen 15 10 6 649 116 162.25 3 3 8 0
Tremlett is back to replace Colly - Colly's bowled enough overs to mean one of the front-liners doesn't have to bowl their full 10 if they get attacked later on, so that'll do from him.Scaly piscine said:Too many easy runs off Collingwood as I expected, I just don't see the point in giving a team 6 an over at this point in the game when you've got 5 full time bowlers.