I remember he said he couldn't cheer much after some win over India or something due to his wife being indian...mofo123 said:wonder who ayesha is supporting? malik and india? or malik on his own...lol, btw he is from my home town of sialkot...love the guy just for that
Known worldwide for the production of soccer balls.Duncan said:Sialkot... it's well known for it's sporting goods isn't it?
Because his bend is over the 15 degree mark. That is what I have gathered from some articles. Apparently, a car accident has left him unable to bowl without bending his elbow at more than 15 degrees. IT is bad luck, I guess. But he is still good enough to be there purely as a batter, IMO, atleast in ODIs.deeps said:in my mind rao ifthikar anjum is a very similar bowler to azhar mahmood. Azhar Mahmood should be in the team ahead of rao, due to his batting prowess.
Pakistan need proper seamers to open the bowling, not dibbly dobly bowlers like rao, rana, khalil etc. Shahid Nazir and Mohamad Sami are both a must and should open the bowling. Rana should be first change with razzaq, and afridi being the 5th bowler
1)Kamran Akmal
2)Salman Butt
3)Younis Khan
4)Inzamam Ul Haq
5)Yousuf Youhana
6)Shahid Afridi b5
7)Abdul Razzaq b4
8)Mohammed Hafeez b6
9)Rana Naved Ul Hasan b3
10)Mohammed Sami b2
11)Shahid Nazir b1
Ideally i'd like to have Shoaib Malik opening the batting with Butt, and Akmal at 8, with hafeez dropping out. But because malik cannot bowl at this stage, the best option is to have hafeez in the team instead.
I have a question on shoaib malik though, what is taking so long for them to clear his action?
The Indians would be five times the ODI side they are if they had Sehwag bowling regularly, picked a bowler who could score runs in big shots and had all eleven players contributing more than a hundred percent on the field, but they DON'T need a so-called wicketkeeper-batsman. Two of these are not too hard, but the selectors have to try hard for the other- then again, they can look at three juniors as future prospects.shaka said:Article about Ganguly being under pressure, and that India are slight favourites for the ODI's because of guys like, Tendulkar, Sehwag, Dravid etc.
http://foxsports.news.com.au/story/0,8659,12712829-23212,00.html
Nnanden said:Im assuming Ganguly`s '???' stand for Bowl 10 overs?
my point was, who bowls the 10 overs left in your side?Arjun said:Tough one, but he's dry weight in an ODI side.
- Get out on first ball
- Give away no extra singles
- Bowl an over of leg-spin
Yeah they have plenty sport factories there ,football,cricket hockey they famous forDuncan said:Sialkot... it's well known for it's sporting goods isn't it?
Sehwag would solve a major chunk of the Indians' ODI problems if he bowled 10 overs. Given the form of the 'specialist' bowlers in the Indian side, that should not be a bad idea, and is a good alternative to playing five bowlers.Nnanden said:my point was, who bowls the 10 overs left in your side?
If you look at it carefully you will find that it floats IN to Ganguly a hell of a lot in the air. Thus the line of delivery has changed considerably. Its almost as if the ball is coming in from wide of mid-wicket !!Sehwag309 said:Vicious Turn