You get 02/03 for batting data but you get 00 for bowling data and maybe 03 if I have worked out P. Samson (Second person in the list - 170 onwards)Neil Pickup said:I don't see any good reason why they should need extra lines of career data - that's the problem, but that 02/03 indicates that they are there.
Could be that, however I think I've managed to get a work-around as it stands - can't promise statistic history editing yet but fingers crossed I should get attributes to load very soon.Eclipse said:I have not been able to have a look at the DB just recently because I had to go out and by a new hard drive because my old one died.
I have not re-installed ICC yet but my question is has anyone figured out what determinds player skin colour? could this be the unknown offset?? I doubt it but just a quick thought.
what about second team avrages?? they are stored for each player I know that however you can only view them at the team selection page.
Neil Pickup said:Could be that, however I think I've managed to get a work-around as it stands - can't promise statistic history editing yet but fingers crossed I should get attributes to load very soon.
But how does Anderson play at international level? Also, if they are the top bowlers, how do some people get these freak players with averages of, for example, 18 at test level, and 13 in FC cricket when theres no further to go in terms of ability.Neil Pickup said:Well, Ricaldo Anderson is the only bowler that I've ever had take 100 wickets in a season in my team!
Just to clarify, "strike" bowlers will take more wickets at a higher economy rate than "stock" bowlers, with similar averages. No front line bowlers should have high strike ratings, these should be the preserve of part-time "partnership breakers".
I'd guess that Cloete's Ian Chivers has a very high strike rating!
Perhaps they cheat!gio said:how do some people get these freak players with averages of, for example, 18 at test level, and 13 in FC cricket when theres no further to go in terms of ability.