Laughing if the team had played badly is fine, not otherwise as it makes no sense the way I look at it. I know others don't see it that way and that is fine.What are you on about Pratters?
You're saying it as if people laughing at Australia have done something wrong.
Go to the 4th test, and look for how many "lols" or something similar there were when England disgracefully collapsed (twice).
What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
Funnily enough I knew someone would pick up on me laughing at Australia collapsing. Yet when people do it for England its all well and good?
Nah, you're ****ting yourself. I can tellozoopsie
Strauss, 100, thanks
It's just a blip, this. Remember Lord's?
Headed back oop north now. Will be watching from my couch. Good chance the series may end tomorrow so will have to have some beers in. If win I'm getting leathered to celebrate. If we lose I'm getting leathered to commiserate. FMD, I love cricketI say give up your job and watch the 4th/5th day on the ground. You deserve it.
Hell any quote from anyone about Broad prior to this session would be interesting.
17 on day 1 at Lord's 2005 springs to mind immediately, not sure that that's a record thoughWow. Is England going to manage to screw this up? Collingwood looked woeful against the short ball. 14 wickets so far on Day 2.Must be close to the Ashes record.
Australia are screwed, terrible batting given the surface, I reckon if this match had been in the subcontinent the ICC would have been up in arms over the pitch being unfit for a test match and all that nonsense. Australia will need something of a miracle to get past 250 on this surface, Swann looked like Murali on it. Completely eat my words over saying they were right to leave out Hauritz. Am still not convinced Broad's good enough mind, wait till SA where he reverts to his short rubbish, I suppose though that every dog has his day. Given the individual stats this will be quite an incredible series victory.
Are you talking 400 lead or an England second innings of 400?So what kind of total do England need to aim for? At this point one would think, first target would be 300 (anything less and Australia have a decent shot at winning this game) and England would want at least 400 to feel safe.
400 lead, dont think they will get anywhere near 400 on their own this inning.Are you talking 400 lead or an England second innings of 400?
You know me too well Cameron!Nah, you're ****ting yourself. I can tell
Australia are screwed, terrible batting given the surface, I reckon if this match had been in the subcontinent the ICC would have been up in arms over the pitch being unfit for a test match and all that nonsense. Australia will need something of a miracle to get past 250 on this surface, Swann looked like Murali on it. Completely eat my words over saying they were right to leave out Hauritz. Am still not convinced Broad's good enough mind, wait till SA where he reverts to his short rubbish, I suppose though that every dog has his day. Given the individual stats this will be quite an incredible series victory.