Tom Halsey
International Coach
Not sure why, he's advanced Tottenham far more than any of the others have their clubs.marc71178 said:Of the 4 named that is the only 1 I was unsure of.
Not sure why, he's advanced Tottenham far more than any of the others have their clubs.marc71178 said:Of the 4 named that is the only 1 I was unsure of.
So when did they last finish as low as 3rd then?Scaly piscine said:Who gives a stuff if you're consistently knocked out at KO stage in the CL and consistently finish 2nd and 3rd in the Premiership? The times they've actually won the league and done anything in the CL are exceptions - so how is being 'the most consistent manager' an asset in these circumstances?
So the results in the Bernabau and the Delle Alpi didn't happen then?Tom Halsey said:Hang on, what has he done? Buying players is mainly down to his scouts, and they're not very good anyway, and without extra signings they won't compete next year. They still can't play away from home against good sides.
Madrid and Juve were both **** on the night.marc71178 said:So the results in the Bernabau and the Delle Alpi didn't happen then?
2nds are still nothing special for a club like Arsenal.marc71178 said:So when did they last finish as low as 3rd then?
That'll be about 1997 I believe.
Going by those kind of standards, there can only be one good manager in the country every season. 2nds and 3rds can be okay depending on the situation. Example: 2nd isn't bad behind the current Chelsea team.Tom Halsey said:2nds are still nothing special for a club like Arsenal.
No, because 2nd would be extremely good for a club like Charlton or someone. But 2nd isn't anything to write home about for a club like Arsenal (and Chelsea have only been around for 2 seasons in the form that they are, before that Arsenal were still 2nd most of the time).Loony BoB said:Going by those kind of standards, there can only be one good manager in the country every season. 2nds and 3rds can be okay depending on the situation. Example: 2nd isn't bad behind the current Chelsea team.
Of course, Juv"leading Serie A by more than Chelsea lead the prem by"entus and Real "Los Galacticos" Madrid are ****.Tom Halsey said:Madrid and Juve were both **** on the night.
Real really aren't that good, especially not in Europe. Just thought I'd add my two cents.Jamee999 said:Of course, Juv"leading Serie A by more than Chelsea lead the prem by"entus and Real "Los Galacticos" Madrid are ****.
9 seasons never finishing out of the top 2 is not bad, and not matched by anyone else.Tom Halsey said:2nds are still nothing special for a club like Arsenal.
Yes it is, of course it is. Arsenal aren't inherently a huge club. We don't have the support or turnover of Man U or Liverpool.Tom Halsey said:2nds are still nothing special for a club like Arsenal.
Yes, but you were 3rd or 4th when Wenger took over (just been watching Sky's Premiership Years) so he's only advanced you a place or two. That's why I don't think it's anything to write home about.BoyBrumby said:Yes it is, of course it is. Arsenal aren't inherently a huge club. We don't have the support or turnover of Man U or Liverpool.
I didn't say that.Jamee999 said:Of course, Juv"leading Serie A by more than Chelsea lead the prem by"entus and Real "Los Galacticos" Madrid are ****.
Not actually true, under Rioch we'd finished 5th in 1996. We didn't trouble the top 3 in the Prem til Wenger took over.Tom Halsey said:Yes, but you were 3rd or 4th when Wenger took over (just been watching Sky's Premiership Years) so he's only advanced you a place or two. That's why I don't think it's anything to write home about.
Well if both of them were also doing extremely well in Europe then I may change my mind, because that would show that the team which is 2nd is only 2nd because the team that is 1st is incredibly good.Loony BoB said:Okay, so what you're saying is that it's impossible for both Arsen and Fergie to BOTH be good managers, because whoever doesn't do better than the other is clearly not good enough...?
5th, 4th. Meh.BoyBrumby said:Not actually true, under Rioch we'd finished 5th in 1996. We didn't trouble the top 3 in the Prem til Wenger took over.
Doesn't prove anything tho. Newcastle were 12 points clear in 1996. It's where a club finishes that matters.Tom Halsey said:5th, 4th. Meh.
Where were you in the Prem in 96/97 when Wenger took over? I remember you being top at some point during that season in November sometime, so they must have been up there.
1990/91: Arsenal 1stTom Halsey said:Yes, but you were 3rd or 4th when Wenger took over (just been watching Sky's Premiership Years) so he's only advanced you a place or two. That's why I don't think it's anything to write home about.
It also doesn't come close to matching Ferguson's achievements at his peak.marc71178 said:9 seasons never finishing out of the top 2 is not bad, and not matched by anyone else.