Neil Pickup
Request Your Custom Title Now!
SWPBarney Rubble said:Chelsea won't get Ballack, 'cause they don't need him. Mourinho's not the type to buy a player for the sake of it.
SWPBarney Rubble said:Chelsea won't get Ballack, 'cause they don't need him. Mourinho's not the type to buy a player for the sake of it.
That wasn't just because he was available though - it was to stop Arsenal getting him, and because they only had 3 wingers instead of 4. Still slightly frivolous, but Ballack would just be superfluous money-spending.Neil Pickup said:
Roberts, and who else? Genuine question.marc71178 said:So £2.4m on 2 strikers isn't much then?
Seems to be the kind of player who wouldn't be into that. Wants to play. But he's a footballer so no surprise if that's true. He's in it for the same reason as Henry, to win the CL.marc71178 said:£££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££
EllingtonTom Halsey said:Roberts, and who else? Genuine question.
Ellington.Tom Halsey said:Roberts, and who else? Genuine question.
Bah! Got there first.superkingdave said:Ellington
So does that mean Wigan could get him, too?marc71178 said:£££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££
HorsfieldTom Halsey said:Roberts, and who else? Genuine question.
Both wrong though.steds said:Bah! Got there first.
But Wigan wouldn't have spent money on Roberts hadn't Horseface ****ed off back to Brum for the same amount which Wigan paid for him (effectively funding the majority of Roberts' transfer).marc71178 said:Horsfield
Horsfield was sold, funding the transfer. Nothing to do with having any more money.marc71178 said:Both wrong though.
I've conceded that money got them out of the lower divisions (League 1 and below I'm talking here).marc71178 said:I'm just using examples.
You can go back to 96/97 and see how it is money that has got them up.
How many bottom division sides can spend over £1m on players in a season?
How many can then continue to spend a lot of money in League 1 (one season over £3.5m)
Now tell me that it isn't money that has got them where they are now.
Why aren't your mob having a crack at him? You guys need the midfielders.aussie said:i see on Skynews that Chelsea are the leading contenders for Ballack according to his agent, that would give Chelsea even more depth , but really i cant see him starting though.
If Barcelona are really keen and offer a huge enough price and it is accepted Lampard maybe be pressured to go to Barca since his missus is from there.Loony BoB said:Ballack rumoured to go to Chelsea, now Lampard rumoured to be thinking of going elsewhere, apparently options include Barcelona. I can't see Chelsea giving up Lampard for Ballack, personally. I'd imagine it will be a case of either they get Ballack or Lampard's opinion on the matter will have more influence than anything else.