SpaceMonkey
International Debutant
it was plum what are you on about?FaaipDeOiad said:Average decision by Dar there. It was touch and go in my view, too much doubt to give it out.
Hit him well in line and was gonna hit middle.
it was plum what are you on about?FaaipDeOiad said:Average decision by Dar there. It was touch and go in my view, too much doubt to give it out.
yep. how was that not plum then?Jono said:Plum? Do you know the meaning of plum?
Yes.twctopcat said:Quoting cricinfo:
"One has to ask was Gibbs not too far forward??"
One has to wonder if anyone cares!!!!!
There's a reason why Botham called Dar a brave umpire for that decision. Look at where he bowled it from, look at how far forward Gibbs was. There was plenty of doubt in that.SpaceMonkey said:yep. how was that not plum then?
In light of the earlier mistake????Let bygones be bygones and all that?Jono said:Yes.
I'm just playing with ya Gibbs should have been out earlier, I acknowledge that.twctopcat said:In light of the earlier mistake????Let bygones be bygones and all that?
I do! Any of numerous varieties of small to medium-sized round or oval smooth-skinned fruit with a single pit.Jono said:Plum? Do you know the meaning of plum?
I already used that joke.Fiery said:I do! Any of numerous varieties of small to medium-sized round or oval smooth-skinned fruit with a single pit.
I kill me
Bugger. Here was I thinking I was a comic genius.Jono said:I already used that joke.
It hit him in line, but it didn't straighten very much and may well have missed leg. It was a touch and go decision, and personally I don't think it should have been given.SpaceMonkey said:it was plum what are you on about?
Hit him well in line and was gonna hit middle.
Omg.. You can only complain about the decision when it actually is wrong... If it's a tight decision and the umpires give it correctly, more power to him. That shows good judgement.FaaipDeOiad said:It hit him in line, but it didn't straighten very much and may well have missed leg. It was a touch and go decision, and personally I don't think it should have been given.
More competitive teams = good for cricketFiery said:How come England are good all of a sudden? I preferred them when they were shite, i.e, 1987-2003
The Shawshank Redemption?twctopcat said:This could call for serious beer sessions tonight.
Remember hope is a good thing, maybe even the best of things......