marc71178
Eyes not spreadsheets
A little bit better than his last trip!alternative said:Flintoff gets another 50.. thats 4th consecutive 50 for him.. well played!!
A little bit better than his last trip!alternative said:Flintoff gets another 50.. thats 4th consecutive 50 for him.. well played!!
Kumble's gotten runs pretty quickly during this series mind youvic_orthdox said:Not necessarily opening, IMO.
If they wanted to win the game, by sending out a night-watchman, you are either wasting a wicket because you want him to get out so that Dravid can make the runs for you, or if you want him to make runs chances are that Kumble will do it a lot slower than recognised batsmen, and make it harder for the team to win.
who knows he doesn't usually drop sitter like thatSJS said:Lets give credit where its due. Umpires are neither here nor there. Hair has as much chance of being biased as Yuvraj has of being involved with bookies for dropping those catches.
As opposed to forcing them to bat out what... 85 overs after the umpires offer the light and England bowl their usual over rate? Look at how many overs have been batted in the previous innings. It is easier to bat time than bat for a target that you have to make.marc71178 said:Because setting 220 in 5 sessions would've really been good wouldn't it?!
Scaly piscine said:As opposed to forcing them to bat out what... 85 overs after the umpires offer the light and England bowl their usual over rate? Look at how many overs have been batted in the previous innings. It is easier to bat time than bat for a target that you have to make.
If India hadn't lost a wicket at the end this would have been a perfect days play for them.
So if I personally know Murali, will people stop arguing about him here with me?Jono said:Please don't fill this thread with talk about whether Hair is biased or not, especially when you are arguing it to someone who apparently knows him. Its going to go nowhere fast!
He's already in Gujarat so he doesn't have to travel as far as Karthik does? Not sure.honestbharani said:Why is Parthiv there and Kaarthick not there?
aussie said:But going back to the match i got a strong feeling England might sneak a win in the end, dont have much reason behind it but i just got this feeling.
Expected.silentstriker said:BTW, Welcome back Ajit Agarkar.
oh well i didn't put Shah in the squad because i thought he wasn't picked for the ODI's, but now that he is he should play in front of either Bell or Prior.open365 said:I don't think prior has any right to be there over Shah, I don't see him suceeding at the top of the order in ODIs just yet, and i think Shah deserves a chance.
I nearly threw up when i realised how poor our bowlings going to be in this series, Jimmy and Fred are good enough, but how much is 30 overs from Ali, Blackwell and Plunkett going to cost us?