***Official*** Bangladesh in England

[Langeveldt]

C'mon Hintonshire..

 

[FaaipDeOiad]

Nice to see Bangladesh on top.

Only 54 needed now, hopefully they'll get home.

 

[andyc]

Nice to see Bangladesh on top.

Only 54 needed now, hopefully they'll get home.

looks unlikely. shoaib to come back on soon, probably, and he'll probably just skittle the tail end

 

[King_Ponting]

34 to go with 4 in hand
this is going to go down to the wire................

 

[FaaipDeOiad]

looks unlikely. shoaib to come back on soon, probably, and he'll probably just skittle the tail end

Only 30 needed now, and Bashar is still there.

 

[andyc]

wow looks like i was wrong. 13 needed with 4 wickets in hand. the tiger's definitely aren't trying to rush it, hey

 

[FaaipDeOiad]

Great win by Bangladesh with a side that certainly wasn't full strength. Hopefully they will get a bit of confidence going into the NWS.

 

[andyc]

Great win by Bangladesh with a side that certainly wasn't full strength. Hopefully they will get a bit of confidence going into the NWS.

word. god knows they need confidence, after all. i do hope they win at least one match in the nws (as long as its not against australia )

 

[James90]

Great win for Bangladesh. Match practise is priceless and good to see all the bowlers chipping in. There's much to come out of it though.

Rajin's form is disgraceful
The extras colomn was even worse
Ashraful looks like he felt bat on ball
Tushar failed (I wouldn't read too much into it but it probably means he won't play on Thursday)

 

[Anil]

word. god knows they need confidence, after all. i do hope they win at least one match in the nws (as long as its not against australia )

isn't it bang, eng and aus? i don't see bang winning one unless eng or aus players go to sleep on the field during the match...

 

[Anil]

Great win by Bangladesh with a side that certainly wasn't full strength. Hopefully they will get a bit of confidence going into the NWS.

sad day for cricket when a laboured win by an international team over an understrength county side is described as "great"....

 

[SquidAU]

sad day for cricket when a laboured win by an international team over an understrength county side is described as "great"....

Never the less, it was a win. Bangladesh don't win that many at all, so give credit where credit is due. I would bet that most County 3rd XI can beat Bangladesh on any other day.

 

[marc71178]

sad day for cricket when a laboured win by an international team over an understrength county side is described as "great"....

Apart from Hick (who's been in v poor one day form this year), that's about the strongest side Worcestershire had available.

 

[FaaipDeOiad]

Apart from Hick (who's been in v poor one day form this year), that's about the strongest side Worcestershire had available.

I was just thinking that.

 

[Nate]

The extras colomn was even worse

Yeah that was uncool. Damn Aftab.

The dissapointing thing is that most of the negative Bangladesh comments are aimed at Bangladesh. Aim them at the ICC people! Poor Bangladeshis...

 

[Anil]

Apart from Hick (who's been in v poor one day form this year), that's about the strongest side Worcestershire had available.

faaipdeoiad suggested that worcestershire were less than full strength, that's why i mentioned that while quoting him....whether they were at full strength or not, my statement still stands....

 

[Anil]

Never the less, it was a win. Bangladesh don't win that many at all, so give credit where credit is due. I would bet that most County 3rd XI can beat Bangladesh on any other day.

what credit do you give a national team who by your own admission would lose to most county 3rd xis on any given day?...for being less mediocre than a county side on one occasion...? i thought you give credit for doing something impressive, exceptional...in short credit-worthy....

 

[Adamc]

faaipdeoiad suggested that worcestershire were less than full strength, that's why i mentioned that while quoting him....whether they were at full strength or not, my statement still stands....

FaaipDeOiad suggested that Bangladesh were understrength, not Worcs. If you read down further you'll see him agreeing with Marc that Worcs were virtually full-strength.

 

[Anil]

FaaipDeOiad suggested that Bangladesh were understrength, not Worcs. If you read down further you'll see him agreeing with Marc that Worcs were virtually full-strength.

oops! my mistake! my statement still stands though....

 

[Legglancer]

A bit harsh, I dont think bangladesh is that far behind west indies !