dontcloseyoureyes
BARNES OUT
If it were me, Martyn goes for Symonds.
I`m just trying to guess what the selectors will do.mikeW said:As much as i dont rate Clark you simply cant drop him from the performances hes put in, probably been our best.
I wouldnt be surprised to see Bracken dropped.Nnanden said:I`m just trying to guess what the selectors will do.
well this is one of the most serious & eagerly anticipated selection of an Australian team that i can remember for a long time.mikeW said:tommorrow morning apparently.
well has you rightly said their he is more suited to bat in the top order no doubt, but even though his technique may be good has he really opened?, i would let him bat in the top 5 at least no doubt.mavric41 said:Get rid of Katich and get Watson to open. He is technically correct, can move the ball around the field while Gilly goes beserk and then keep going once his eye is in. He is much more suited up the order than down and slogging. This also gives the openers a right/left hand combination and we can play both Watson and Symonds and 4 bowlers.
It's called stubborness, and a complete inability to admit that they're wrong. It's like our only hope of chasing or setting the 280+ totals that will be required on the small grounds and flat wickets of the Carribean (WC2007) will be if Katich is dismissed early.sqwerty said:GET RID OF KATICH NOWWWW...or even Martyn if he's going to keep on playing for himself.
I can't for the life of me understand why the hell Katich is selected to open the innings. It's so regressive of Australia's thinking. Why all of a sudden do we need a sheet anchor in the opening role?????
I would have thought that game against Sri Lanka in Sydney when we hit 360 after being 3-10 would have shown that a sheet anchor is unnecessary.
And how the hell can anyone say that Katich, a stodgy makeshift opener, can do a better job than Hayden?
To leave blokes like Hussey with 5 overs to face is absurd !!!!
Any of those attacking Australian batsmen can play the sheet anchor role if required.
Just pick 7 blazers and they'll do the job !
It dumbfounds me!
Well he's not going to say "I was seeing them like watermelons" is he?aussie said:This what Langer said about Gillespie's & Tait bowling in the recent Pura Cup Match:
``Interest before the WACA match had focused on the duel between Jason Gillespie and Shaun Tait for Glenn McGrath's bowling berth in South Africa.
Langer said on his assessment, Gillespie had bowled the better of the two on an unresponsive Perth pitch.
"I thought Dizzy bowled really well, particularly the second morning, really good areas ... but they are such different bowlers," Langer said.
"Shaun Tait is going to run in and bowl as fast he can, and he's going to have that fear factor there all the time because of his pace.
"On a very flat wicket I thought they both did serviceable sort of jobs."
sounds fair to me..
lol, well i mentioned what he said because he is one of the senior memebers of the side & if he can speak well about these 2, who are hot candidates to make test side, the selectors should take a hint.Linda said:Well he's not going to say "I was seeing them like watermelons" is he?
1. Well i would say at this stage if we compare Watson to some of the other young all-rounders coming up i.e Bravo & Pathan he looks a bit below par with the ball but with the bat i'd say he pretty safe.Francis said:I never got the thing on Watson. When he first came onto the scene he looked good. But for me, he looks a notch below the level of international players in both bating and bowling.
I'd also get rid of Katich and Martyn. That's coming from a Damien Martyn fan who enjoys seeing his elegant strokes. I considered Martyn the best cricketer in the world for 2004 for all his centuries in the sub-continent. By in ODI's, he's too slow. He looked like he was playing for his career. Katich makes good runs, but yeah, too slow. Australia should have made 275 yesterday.
Anyway, I seriously think Australia would be lucky to win this series. SA let that one get away yesterday.
Xuhaib said:New Zeland is not consistent enough to fight for the top spot. They tend to get hammered quite frequently and most of their top players are often injured.
And by "vying for the top spot" i meant both test and Odi's and can you tell me the last time NZL won a meaningfull test series. No desrespect to NZ i do like them but dont consider them as the real top dogs.
I don't think seeing them like that would quite help. They'd blend in with the colour of the pitch.Linda said:Well he's not going to say "I was seeing them like watermelons" is he?