• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

**Official** Australia in India Thread

Mister Wright

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
FaaipDeOiad said:
For those who missed it - Gilchrist just caught Kaif off his glove and the appeal was turned down. After it Gilchrist said to Kaif "that came off your glove mate" and it looked like Kaif responded with a nod, then Gilchrist said "the whole world is watching, champ".

Interesting confrontation. Some might interpret it as Gilchrist telling another batsman to walk, although I think it is pretty standard fare for when a batsman if clearly gone and is given not out, it just happened to be caught on the stump microphone.
Yes definately came off the glove.
 

Mister Wright

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Deja moo said:
Do you guys reckon 180 will cause Aus much trouble ?

Only if they get early wickets. The Indians have showed the Australians how to bat on the pitch, controlled aggresion. Perhaps having spinners at both ends mike make it a different story for the Australians, but they will need 180 at least.
 

shaka

International Regular
FaaipDeOiad said:
For those who missed it - Gilchrist just caught Kaif off his glove and the appeal was turned down. After it Gilchrist said to Kaif "that came off your glove mate" and it looked like Kaif responded with a nod, then Gilchrist said "the whole world is watching, champ".

Interesting confrontation. Some might interpret it as Gilchrist telling another batsman to walk, although I think it is pretty standard fare for when a batsman if clearly gone and is given not out, it just happened to be caught on the stump microphone.
That is ridiculous umpiring, and should have the stump mike connected to his ear.
 

shaka

International Regular
yeah I guess he did, any fines coming his way? he should, cos he is bringing the game into disrepute by cheating the system, and admitting it, and proof is available. IMO
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
shaka said:
That is ridiculous umpiring, and should have the stump mike connected to his ear.
That's one bit of technology which would have helped without holding up the game at all.
 

tooextracool

International Coach
Jnr. said:
I wonder what he would've scored if the umpire didn't give him out lbw, which was a bit iffy.
more shots like that and i doubt he would have survived much longer anyways. playing kumble back in itself is bad enough but to play kumble(or for that matter any bowler) on the back foot on that wicket suggests that you've got a death wish.
 

SJS

Hall of Fame Member
Sanz said:
I dont think SJS is criticizing Tendulkar for being aggresive. What he means to say that Sweep shot is a very risky shot, especially in conditions like that when there is uneven bounce on the pitch. Tendulkar should have chosen his shots carefully.
Thanks Sanz. Thats exactly what I meant (and thought I said ) :happy:
 

FaaipDeOiad

Hall of Fame Member
What a catch by Ponting! Two wickets for Clarke in test cricket and a bunch of catches in the last two matches as well. Looks like he can't do a thing wrong.
 

Top