cameeel said:YES!! Great ball from Warne, finally Rudi gave him out
Trescothik lwb b Warne
Have to say my initial thought was out - didn't turn as much as the first one.social said:First one was plumb, that was marginal.
Byes taken is not always bad luck (and has no impact on his figures)Slats4ever said:Lee has to be the most unlucky bowler ever. Every time I see him play he's getting catches dropped, bowling people off no balls and byes taken.
unfortunately the only flashing lights will no doubt be the ones I'll be seeing from over-tiredness.....Just happens to be the most important meeting i've had in 3 months or so....has to be the morning after this test doesn't it !!!!!howardj said:lol
make sure you include plenty of diversions - eg sausage rolls; flashing lights etc
Haha, back online and up to date with the last 20 pages. Always makes me laugh.social said:Anyway Marc, now you're back on-line, can you finally admit (after 10 innings no less) that Bell is ordinary?
Only if it dismisses a Durham player is it good bowling (and even then he often will moan about poor decisions)andyc said:I don't get you, SP. You never seem willing to give credit where it's due. It was a good ball, and a good catch.
Actually, anyone not from Durham.Beleg said:nah, everyone who is not a Pom.
He has had a far bigger effect on England than any player in the last 6 years.social said:So, he can bat, bowl, or field for them.
Don't kid yourself!
Either you're a complete imbecile or you're a brain dead moronsocial said:Set up, set up, run, out.
Either he's dumb, you are, or Warne's a genius that has taken 600 wickets.
You choose
As I see it, it's 5 o'clock then 15 overs.wpdavid said:So what's the time limit tonight, or is it simply a matter of getting through the 98 overs?
(wondering whether England can get away with bowling 10 overs an hour...)
from what they said at the start of play the last hour doesn't start until 83 overs have been bowled in the daymarc71178 said:As I see it, it's 5 o'clock then 15 overs.
So that's 3 and a half hours then 15 overs.
Take out 10 minutes for change of innings and another 10 for the new batsmen coming in and time's not as much as it seems.
Certainly we won't get near 73 more overs.
Scaly piscine said:Either you're a complete imbecile or you're a brain dead moron
You choose
What's the latest the 'final hour' can start?marc71178 said:As I see it, it's 5 o'clock then 15 overs.
So that's 3 and a half hours then 15 overs.
Take out 10 minutes for change of innings and another 10 for the new batsmen coming in and time's not as much as it seems.
Certainly we won't get near 73 more overs.