luckyeddie
Cricket Web Staff Member
To listen to some, Simon Taufel's the only decent umpire left.shaka said:I think Bucknor should be given the old heave ho.
Although weren't the Indian fans moaning about him a few months ago?
To listen to some, Simon Taufel's the only decent umpire left.shaka said:I think Bucknor should be given the old heave ho.
That will be the day that test cricket dies. You'll be looking at about 10 overs an hour maximum.James said:My personal take is that it's only a matter of time before all decisions are referred to the 3rd Umpire to ensure the correct decision is made.
We have the technology, why not use it? With cricket now a professional game, a wrong decision can make or break a players career.
Yep. Aussie supporters can blame our bats as much as we like, and it's not as if they're free of blame, but having the bowlers in the last three matches concede these kinds of scores first up has a) made each game enormously difficult to win before we've even batted and consequently b) put the batsmen under a huge amount of pressure.superkingdave said:Three quick questions.
when was the last time England made 3 consecutive 1st innings scores of 400+?
when was the last time England made 3 consecutive 1st innings scores of 400+ against Australia?
when was the last time Australia conceded 3 consecutive 400+ 1st innings scores?
Your not the only one - how on earth was Geriant Jones (IIRC it was him or Flintoff) was not out caught behind after lunch I will never know. And if you took Richard's first chance theroy in place then Jones did not deserve his 85 as he would have out there and then. But credit to him for going on and gett 85, as Boycott said he is a lot better batsman then what gives justice to himself and he should prove so. Flintoff's innings was another showing of his class as a batsman alone.shaka said:Am I the only one who feels Bucknor has umpired too many games and has started to go a bit deaf and sometimes blind? no offence.
The one soloutation to Hayden is tell him he is no longer a certainty in the Australian team - then he will make some runs.Nnanden said:At least Katich is showing some fight.
Langer - Has looked alright, nothing special.
Hayden - Absolute crap, he has done nothing.
Ponting - A few good innings, a bit of inconsistency, horrible captaincy.
Martyn - Unlucky. Hasn`t really done much wrong.
Clarke - Out of his league, give him a run for NSW.
Katich - Hasn`t looked the part, may he score some runs now.
Gilchrist - The same, has been abvoe par only with the gloves.
Warne - Legned, with ball and bat.
Lee - Lacking the height that rocked the Kiwis and made him a force in the VB series.
Gillespie - Gah.
McGrath - Best bowler ever. Doesn`t do anything wrong except get injured.
Tait - Alright debut, best of the Aussie pacemen this game so far. Which isn`t good.
Kasper - What happened? He`s making love to the leg-stump.
Suggested moves.
Hussey - Dominated in the shorter form, give him a go.
Jaques - Knows the English conditions, scores double 100`s. Please try him.
Bracken - He can swing it. Look at the swing Hoggard is getting, at least try him.
Other than that, we`re screwed!
Bucknor has made some shockers. I just don't get it, these umpires are meant to be the best in the business, yet they miss obvious edges. One or two isn't too bad but when they're happening so consistently something should be done. Obviously Australia has received the worst of these, but England has had a few dodgy decisions against them too.Josh said:Overhall of umpires needed.
Yeah, its frustrating isn't it? He looks to be handling everything sweet, and he plays some absolutely ridiculous shots. Considering the situation, it would have been much better for him to knuckle down and at least see out the day. Katich is ideal for this situation, I hope he can combine with Gilchrist to at least get this match to a fourth day.aussie said:Clarke is encouraging contrating emotions for me, ifeel he is going to make a BIG one but when he plays shots like that he gets me worried.....
Would you believe it as soon type he gets out, i'm going to shut my mouth from now on
Slow Love™ said:Yep. Aussie supporters can blame our bats as much as we like, and it's not as if they're free of blame, but having the bowlers in the last three matches concede these kinds of scores first up has a) made each game enormously difficult to win before we've even batted and consequently b) put the batsmen under a huge amount of pressure.
And it's no coincidence that the last time this happened (in games between Australia and England) is the last time England won the Ashes.
We've been doing it to other sides for years. And teams with great bowling attacks are the ones that dominate the game. England's looks way better than ours right now.
Yeah, agreed - I did mention the catching in an earlier post. I was more responding to posts laying all the blame for our position at the feet of the batsmen, where I'd say what's happened when we've been in the field has put the bats under enormous pressure (and into situations where wins are already pretty unlikely). I also think the English bowlers have just bowled a lot better than ours have in general.Mister Wright said:Catches win matches.
Pretty tough to lay all the blame on the batsman and bowlers. If we had of taken our catches, it could have made things easier on them and more pressure on the English bats and our batsman mightn't have been looking at daunting totals.
Oh definitley. Despite our fielding woes, the bowlers should be trying to get a wicket every ball or at least trying to work to a plan to get a wicket (ala Flintoff v Hayden 2nd innings 3rd test), however I haven't seen that from any of the bowlers (McGrath excluded). Lee has just looked to bowl fast, he hasn't bowled to a plan and for all the talk of getting him into the test team due to his one day form he hasn't been much of a strike bowler. Gillespie was just trying to get it on the pitch, not trying to get them out, and Kaspa must feel like he's bowling for his spot with every delivery. Even Warne has been concerntrating more on his hair than his bowling, but he is obvious class, so it doesn't really matter.Slow Love™ said:Yeah, agreed - I did mention the catching in an earlier post. I was more responding to posts laying all the blame for our position at the feet of the batsmen, where I'd say what's happened when we've been in the field has put the bats under enormous pressure (and into situations where wins are already pretty unlikely). I also think the English bowlers have just bowled a lot better than ours have in general.