• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** Australia in England (The Ashes)

aussie

Hall of Fame Member
King_Ponting said:
he cant tho cause its a no-ball... and u cant have the runner getting out bowled as the runner does not take strike
i was refering to the batsman who would be on strike.....
 

aussie

Hall of Fame Member
King_Ponting said:
But its still a no ball mate. Therefore the batsman is not out.
ohhh well yeah, well then the only way the runner could be run out is if the runner is out of his crease & the fielder hits the stumps i guess but i'm not sure.........
 

vic_orthdox

Global Moderator
aussie said:
ohhh well yeah, well then the only way the runner could be run out is if the runner is out of his crease & the fielder hits the stumps i guess but i'm not sure.........
It'd be like being run-out up the bowlers end off a straight drive, but no-one touched it. Wouldn't it?
 

vic_orthdox

Global Moderator
King_Ponting said:
You wouldnt think that with his action that he'd be an outswing bowler..... Strange indeed.
Shows what wrist position does. No wonder he gets such good reverse swing, the way he brings his wrist around the back of the ball like he does as he brings his arm over.
vic_orthdox said:
It'd be like being run-out up the bowlers end off a straight drive, but no-one touched it. Wouldn't it?
Then again, maybe not. You'd be able to cheat and just go and stand a metre out of the crease to try and make it easier to get down the other end and not be run out. Meh...
 

FaaipDeOiad

Hall of Fame Member
Pedro Delgado said:
I didn't realise he swung it so much, looks good the young pup does.
Tait actually moves the ball quite a lot, off the seam as well sometimes. He's also a big reverser of the ball, which is part of the reason that half (or even more, I think) of his victims last year were bowled and lbw. Now, if he can just bowl it straight enough... :p
 

aussie

Hall of Fame Member
FaaipDeOiad said:
Tait actually moves the ball quite a lot, off the seam as well sometimes. He's also a big reverser of the ball, which is part of the reason that half (or even more, I think) of his victims last year were bowled and lbw. Now, if he can just bowl it straight enough... :p
he looks like he could be a dangerous bowler to the right-handers once he does get his straight....
 

FaaipDeOiad

Hall of Fame Member
Interesting that the ball is still going conventionally after 30 overs, and looks in very good shape. Shows that this pitch is far less abrasive than that seen at Old Trafford, and it's unlikely to reverse much, at least not early.
 

Top