Anyone remember Pakistan at the WACA?aussie said:oh dear , this is the worst start Australia have had in a long time, Hodge could be playing sooner rather than later now. Boy my fingers are crossed for another Gilchrist miracle
yea that sounds bettersuperkingdave said:when he's as good as he is i don't think you can call it a miracle, more a Gilchrist 'special'
Although note the strength of the Kiwi attack that day...England certainly pose a much stronger line-up so it certainly won't be easy.Adamc said:Gilchrist and Katich put on 212 three Tests ago... here's hoping.
yes is certainly od, but the big difference between the W.A.C.A & Lord's thus far is that it was Akhtar causing havoc on that first morning while today its all 4 english quicksSirBloody Idiot said:Anyone remember Pakistan at the WACA?
Hoping to get rich off it eh?superkingdave said:Australia 97/5 (23.0 ov) v England
Lunch - Day 1
Australia won the toss and elected to bat first
SM Katich 7* AC Gilchrist 8* SP Jones 2/15 A Flintoff 1/16
Last wicket: 87/5
for prosperity
Yes, it's more of a hope than an expectation. I'm fairly confident though that at least one of them will make a decent score, if not a century then at least something enough to reach a defendable target, i.e. 200+.Somerset said:Although note the strength of the Kiwi attack that day...England certainly pose a much stronger line-up so it certainly won't be easy.
well thats possible also, but it isn't often when Australia has to do that...Pratyush said:There are more chances of Australia being bowled out early than a Gilchist bravado saving a first inning low score. But a test match has 2 innings a side and Australia can bounce back despite a low first inning score.
Somerset said:but Michael Clarke, unless he scores something big in his second dig, doesn't look to have a secure position IMO.
Well, he does have more runs than Pietersen this county season - and at a better strike rate, too.aussie said:any bets for Warne getting to 50 or 100 today, he's been in good form
C'MON warnie!!!!Loony BoB said:Well, he does have more runs than Pietersen this county season - and at a better strike rate, too.
He got across to it, but it went under him, so too short.wpdavid said:Oh, I hadn't realised it was short. I didn't think it was that wide though.
Hmmm..he did look in good form but I'd be more worried at the shot he played than argue over whether the umpire should've made the no-ball call.SirBloody Idiot said:The wrong decision on Langer being out may turn out to be very costly for the Aussies.