King_Ponting
International Regular
Use the exclamation mark next to the green light C_C
i'm a guilty of one here, sorryJames said:Can people watch their language please! Keep it clean!
And then you will also die!Nnanden said:Incredible.
I eat my dinner, Australia die. I`ll never eat again!
Thank you!superkingdave said:on the left hand side of the post under the name is a warning sign, you click on that
I told you the same thing in case u missed it C_CKing_Ponting said:Use the exclamation mark next to the green light C_C
Based on what exactly?King_Ponting said:Could a score of less than 300 be par?
At the moment, I wouldn't bet against it...with another wicket in the next few overs and...King_Ponting said:Could a score of less than 300 be par?
Yes. Thank you for that.King_Ponting said:I told you the same thing in case u missed it C_C
Doubt it. The pitch doesn't look all that difficult - apart from a few balls the bounce has been consistent enough, and the level of sideways movement hasn't been anything out of the ordinary. England have exploited the conditions very well though. Australia have scored at a quick rate anyway; they just need to stop getting out.King_Ponting said:Could a score of less than 300 be par?
The wicket has plenty of bounce, but it seems quite even and isn't swinging anymore really, so I'd think 350+ is what you'd want batting first.King_Ponting said:Could a score of less than 300 be par?
350-400 would be a good score - which would be wanted. Any thing above 400, the batting team has done well. Restricting Australia to less than 350 is some thing England would have settled at once Ponting chose to bat IMO.pskov said:The wicket has plenty of bounce, but it seems quite even and isn't swinging anymore really, so I'd think 350+ is what you'd want batting first.